feat(primitive): Signer recovery

[rakita]

I added signer recovery with seckp256k1 lib.

there are a few additional changes in consensus for tx validity that are unrelated to recovery but seem okay to be merged, I will continue working on those.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #179 (5b1b852) into main (b970079) will increase coverage by 0.14%.
The diff coverage is 65.35%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #179      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   69.97%   70.11%   +0.14%     
==========================================
  Files         191      192       +1     
  Lines       15408    15604     +196     
==========================================
+ Hits        10781    10941     +160     
- Misses       4627     4663      +36     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
crates/consensus/src/verification.rs	68.18% <0.00%> (-12.59%)	⬇️
crates/executor/src/executor.rs	0.00% <ø> (ø)
crates/interfaces/src/consensus.rs	100.00% <ø> (ø)
crates/primitives/src/lib.rs	100.00% <ø> (ø)
crates/primitives/src/transaction/mod.rs	86.22% <80.40%> (+7.76%)	⬆️
crates/consensus/src/config.rs	75.00% <100.00%> (ø)
crates/net/eth-wire/src/types/transactions.rs	91.98% <100.00%> (ø)
crates/primitives/src/transaction/signature.rs	79.54% <100.00%> (+6.81%)	⬆️
crates/primitives/src/transaction/util.rs	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
crates/net/discv4/src/lib.rs	67.85% <0.00%> (-0.15%)	⬇️
... and 6 more

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[rkrasiuk]

lgtm, left some comments

[rakita]

Done some cleanup and found bug in hash calculation that took me some time to find.

in essence for typed transaction hash was calculated over rlp header hash(rlp(02|rlp_list())) while hash should be without that header hash(02|rlp_list())

[rkrasiuk]

lgtm

[mattsse]

lgtm