dispute-coordinator: disabling in participation

polkadot/node/core/backing/src/lib.rs

@@ -1030,9 +1030,10 @@ async fn construct_per_relay_parent_state<Context>(
 	// Once runtime ver `DISABLED_VALIDATORS_RUNTIME_REQUIREMENT` is released remove this call to
 	// `get_disabled_validators_with_fallback`, add `request_disabled_validators` call to the
 	// `try_join!` above and use `try_runtime_api!` to get `disabled_validators`
-	let disabled_validators = get_disabled_validators_with_fallback(ctx.sender(), parent)
-		.await
-		.map_err(Error::UtilError)?;
+	let disabled_validators =
+		get_disabled_validators_with_fallback(ctx.sender(), parent).await.map_err(|e| {
+			Error::UtilError(TryFrom::try_from(e).expect("the conversion is infallible; qed"))
+		})?;
 
 	let signing_context = SigningContext { parent_hash: parent, session_index };
 	let validator = match Validator::construct(

polkadot/node/core/dispute-coordinator/src/import.rs

@@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ pub struct CandidateEnvironment<'a> {
 	executor_params: &'a ExecutorParams,
 	/// Validator indices controlled by this node.
 	controlled_indices: HashSet<ValidatorIndex>,
+	/// Indices of disabled validators at the `relay_parent`.
+	disabled_indices: HashSet<ValidatorIndex>,
 }
 
 #[overseer::contextbounds(DisputeCoordinator, prefix = self::overseer)]
@@ -66,6 +68,16 @@ impl<'a> CandidateEnvironment<'a> {
 		session_index: SessionIndex,
 		relay_parent: Hash,
 	) -> Option<CandidateEnvironment<'a>> {
+		let disabled_indices = runtime_info
+			.get_disabled_validators(ctx.sender(), relay_parent)
+			.await
+			.unwrap_or_else(|err| {
+				gum::info!(target: LOG_TARGET, ?err, "Failed to get disabled validators");
+				Vec::new()
+			})
+			.into_iter()
+			.collect();
+
 		let (session, executor_params) = match runtime_info
 			.get_session_info_by_index(ctx.sender(), relay_parent, session_index)
 			.await
@@ -76,7 +88,7 @@ impl<'a> CandidateEnvironment<'a> {
 		};
 
 		let controlled_indices = find_controlled_validator_indices(keystore, &session.validators);
-		Some(Self { session_index, session, executor_params, controlled_indices })
+		Some(Self { session_index, session, executor_params, controlled_indices, disabled_indices })
 	}
 
 	/// Validators in the candidate's session.
@@ -103,6 +115,11 @@ impl<'a> CandidateEnvironment<'a> {
 	pub fn controlled_indices(&'a self) -> &'a HashSet<ValidatorIndex> {
 		&self.controlled_indices
 	}
+
+	/// Indices of disabled validators at the `relay_parent`.
+	pub fn disabled_indices(&'a self) -> &'a HashSet<ValidatorIndex> {
+		&self.disabled_indices
+	}
 }
 
 /// Whether or not we already issued some statement about a candidate.
@@ -344,6 +361,14 @@ impl CandidateVoteState<CandidateVotes> {
 		&self.votes.candidate_receipt
 	}
 
+	/// Returns true if all the invalid votes are from disabled validators.
+	pub fn invalid_votes_all_disabled(
+		&self,
+		mut is_disabled: impl FnMut(&ValidatorIndex) -> bool,
+	) -> bool {
+		self.votes.invalid.keys().all(|i| is_disabled(i))
+	}
+
 	/// Extract `CandidateVotes` for handling import of new statements.
 	fn into_old_state(self) -> (CandidateVotes, CandidateVoteState<()>) {
 		let CandidateVoteState { votes, own_vote, dispute_status, byzantine_threshold_against } =

polkadot/node/core/dispute-coordinator/src/initialized.rs

@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 //! Dispute coordinator subsystem in initialized state (after first active leaf is received).
 
 use std::{
-	collections::{BTreeMap, VecDeque},
+	collections::{BTreeMap, HashSet, VecDeque},
 	sync::Arc,
 };
 
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ use polkadot_primitives::{
 	DisputeStatementSet, Hash, ScrapedOnChainVotes, SessionIndex, ValidDisputeStatementKind,
 	ValidatorId, ValidatorIndex,
 };
+use schnellru::{LruMap, UnlimitedCompact};
 
 use crate::{
 	db,
@@ -92,6 +93,9 @@ pub struct InitialData {
 pub(crate) struct Initialized {
 	keystore: Arc<LocalKeystore>,
 	runtime_info: RuntimeInfo,
+	/// We have the onchain state of disabled validators as well as the offchain
+	/// state that is based on the lost disputes.
+	offchain_disabled_validators: OffchainDisabledValidators,
 	/// This is the highest `SessionIndex` seen via `ActiveLeavesUpdate`. It doesn't matter if it
 	/// was cached successfully or not. It is used to detect ancient disputes.
 	highest_session_seen: SessionIndex,
@@ -130,10 +134,12 @@ impl Initialized {
 
 		let (participation_sender, participation_receiver) = mpsc::channel(1);
 		let participation = Participation::new(participation_sender, metrics.clone());
+		let offchain_disabled_validators = OffchainDisabledValidators::default();
 
 		Self {
 			keystore,
 			runtime_info,
+			offchain_disabled_validators,
 			highest_session_seen,
 			gaps_in_cache,
 			spam_slots,
@@ -319,13 +325,16 @@ impl Initialized {
 					self.runtime_info.pin_block(session_idx, new_leaf.unpin_handle);
 					// Fetch the last `DISPUTE_WINDOW` number of sessions unless there are no gaps
 					// in cache and we are not missing too many `SessionInfo`s
-					let mut lower_bound = session_idx.saturating_sub(DISPUTE_WINDOW.get() - 1);
-					if !self.gaps_in_cache && self.highest_session_seen > lower_bound {
-						lower_bound = self.highest_session_seen + 1
-					}
+					let prune_up_to = session_idx.saturating_sub(DISPUTE_WINDOW.get() - 1);
+					let fetch_lower_bound =
+						if !self.gaps_in_cache && self.highest_session_seen > prune_up_to {
+							self.highest_session_seen + 1
+						} else {
+							prune_up_to
+						};
 
 					// There is a new session. Perform a dummy fetch to cache it.
-					for idx in lower_bound..=session_idx {
+					for idx in fetch_lower_bound..=session_idx {
 						if let Err(err) = self
 							.runtime_info
 							.get_session_info_by_index(ctx.sender(), new_leaf.hash, idx)
@@ -344,11 +353,9 @@ impl Initialized {
 
 					self.highest_session_seen = session_idx;
 
-					db::v1::note_earliest_session(
-						overlay_db,
-						session_idx.saturating_sub(DISPUTE_WINDOW.get() - 1),
-					)?;
-					self.spam_slots.prune_old(session_idx.saturating_sub(DISPUTE_WINDOW.get() - 1));
+					db::v1::note_earliest_session(overlay_db, prune_up_to)?;
+					self.spam_slots.prune_old(prune_up_to);
+					self.offchain_disabled_validators.prune_old(prune_up_to);
 				},
 				Ok(_) => { /* no new session => nothing to cache */ },
 				Err(err) => {
@@ -978,11 +985,13 @@ impl Initialized {
 			Some(env) => env,
 		};
 
+		let n_validators = env.validators().len();
+
 		gum::trace!(
 			target: LOG_TARGET,
 			?candidate_hash,
 			?session,
-			num_validators = ?env.session_info().validators.len(),
+			?n_validators,
 			"Number of validators"
 		);
 
@@ -1084,18 +1093,42 @@ impl Initialized {
 			target: LOG_TARGET,
 			?candidate_hash,
 			?session,
-			num_validators = ?env.session_info().validators.len(),
+			?n_validators,
 			"Import result ready"
 		);
+
 		let new_state = import_result.new_state();
 
+		let byzantine_threshold = polkadot_primitives::byzantine_threshold(n_validators);
+		// combine on-chain with off-chain disabled validators
+		// process disabled validators in the following order:
+		// - on-chain disabled validators
+		// - prioritized order of off-chain disabled validators
+		// deduplicate the list and take at most `byzantine_threshold` validators
+		let disabled_validators = {
+			let mut d: HashSet<ValidatorIndex> = HashSet::new();
+			for v in env
+				.disabled_indices()
+				.iter()
+				.cloned()
+				.chain(self.offchain_disabled_validators.iter(session))
+			{
+				if d.len() == byzantine_threshold {
+					break
+				}
+				d.insert(v);
+			}
+			d
+		};
+
 		let is_included = self.scraper.is_candidate_included(&candidate_hash);
 		let is_backed = self.scraper.is_candidate_backed(&candidate_hash);
 		let own_vote_missing = new_state.own_vote_missing();
 		let is_disputed = new_state.is_disputed();
 		let is_confirmed = new_state.is_confirmed();
-		let potential_spam = is_potential_spam(&self.scraper, &new_state, &candidate_hash);
-		// We participate only in disputes which are not potential spam.
+		let potential_spam = is_potential_spam(&self.scraper, &new_state, &candidate_hash, |v| {
+			disabled_validators.contains(v)
+		});
 		let allow_participation = !potential_spam;
 
 		gum::trace!(
@@ -1106,6 +1139,7 @@ impl Initialized {
 			?candidate_hash,
 			confirmed = ?new_state.is_confirmed(),
 			has_invalid_voters = ?!import_result.new_invalid_voters().is_empty(),
+			n_disabled_validators = ?disabled_validators.len(),
 			"Is spam?"
 		);
 
@@ -1337,6 +1371,10 @@ impl Initialized {
 					);
 				}
 			}
+			for validator_index in new_state.votes().invalid.keys() {
+				self.offchain_disabled_validators
+					.insert_against_valid(session, *validator_index);
+			}
 			self.metrics.on_concluded_valid();
 		}
 		if import_result.is_freshly_concluded_against() {
@@ -1356,6 +1394,14 @@ impl Initialized {
 					);
 				}
 			}
+			for (validator_index, (kind, _sig)) in new_state.votes().valid.raw() {
+				let is_backer = kind.is_backing();
+				self.offchain_disabled_validators.insert_for_invalid(
+					session,
+					*validator_index,
+					is_backer,
+				);
+			}
 			self.metrics.on_concluded_invalid();
 		}
 
@@ -1591,3 +1637,82 @@ fn determine_undisputed_chain(
 
 	Ok(last)
 }
+
+#[derive(Default)]
+struct OffchainDisabledValidators {
+	// Ideally, we want to use the top `byzantine_threshold` offenders here based on the amount of
+	// stake slashed. However, given that slashing might be applied with a delay, we want to have
+	// some list of offenders as soon as disputes conclude offchain. This list only approximates
+	// the top offenders and only accounts for lost disputes. But that should be good enough to
+	// prevent spam attacks.
+	per_session: BTreeMap<SessionIndex, LostSessionDisputes>,
+}
+
+struct LostSessionDisputes {
+	// We separate lost disputes to prioritize "for invalid" offenders. And among those, we
+	// prioritize backing votes the most. There's no need to limit the size of these sets, as they
+	// are already limited by the number of validators in the session. We use `LruMap` to ensure
+	// the iteration order prioritizes most recently disputes lost over older ones in case we reach
+	// the limit.
+	backers_for_invalid: LruMap<ValidatorIndex, (), UnlimitedCompact>,
+	for_invalid: LruMap<ValidatorIndex, (), UnlimitedCompact>,
+	against_valid: LruMap<ValidatorIndex, (), UnlimitedCompact>,
+}
+
+impl Default for LostSessionDisputes {
+	fn default() -> Self {
+		Self {
+			backers_for_invalid: LruMap::new(UnlimitedCompact),
+			for_invalid: LruMap::new(UnlimitedCompact),
+			against_valid: LruMap::new(UnlimitedCompact),
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+impl OffchainDisabledValidators {
+	fn prune_old(&mut self, up_to_excluding: SessionIndex) {
+		// split_off returns everything after the given key, including the key.
+		let mut relevant = self.per_session.split_off(&up_to_excluding);
+		std::mem::swap(&mut relevant, &mut self.per_session);
+	}
+
+	fn insert_for_invalid(
+		&mut self,
+		session_index: SessionIndex,
+		validator_index: ValidatorIndex,
+		is_backer: bool,
+	) {
+		let entry = self.per_session.entry(session_index).or_default();
+		if is_backer {
+			entry.backers_for_invalid.insert(validator_index, ());
+		} else {
+			entry.for_invalid.insert(validator_index, ());
+		}
+	}
+
+	fn insert_against_valid(
+		&mut self,
+		session_index: SessionIndex,
+		validator_index: ValidatorIndex,
+	) {
+		self.per_session
+			.entry(session_index)
+			.or_default()
+			.against_valid
+			.insert(validator_index, ());
+	}
+
+	/// Iterate over all validators that are offchain disabled.
+	/// The order of iteration prioritizes `for_invalid` offenders (and backers among those) over
+	/// `against_valid` offenders. And most recently lost disputes over older ones.
+	/// NOTE: the iterator might contain duplicates.
+	fn iter(&self, session_index: SessionIndex) -> impl Iterator<Item = ValidatorIndex> + '_ {
+		self.per_session.get(&session_index).into_iter().flat_map(|e| {
+			e.backers_for_invalid
+				.iter()
+				.chain(e.for_invalid.iter())
+				.chain(e.against_valid.iter())
+				.map(|(i, _)| *i)
+		})
+	}
+}

polkadot/node/core/dispute-coordinator/src/lib.rs

@@ -370,8 +370,10 @@ impl DisputeCoordinatorSubsystem {
 					},
 				};
 			let vote_state = CandidateVoteState::new(votes, &env, now);
-
-			let potential_spam = is_potential_spam(&scraper, &vote_state, candidate_hash);
+			let onchain_disabled = env.disabled_indices();
+			let potential_spam = is_potential_spam(&scraper, &vote_state, candidate_hash, |v| {
+				onchain_disabled.contains(v)
+			});
 			let is_included =
 				scraper.is_candidate_included(&vote_state.votes().candidate_receipt.hash());
 
@@ -462,17 +464,20 @@ async fn wait_for_first_leaf<Context>(ctx: &mut Context) -> Result<Option<Activa
 /// Check wheter a dispute for the given candidate could be spam.
 ///
 /// That is the candidate could be made up.
-pub fn is_potential_spam<V>(
+pub fn is_potential_spam(
 	scraper: &ChainScraper,
-	vote_state: &CandidateVoteState<V>,
+	vote_state: &CandidateVoteState<CandidateVotes>,
 	candidate_hash: &CandidateHash,
+	is_disabled: impl FnMut(&ValidatorIndex) -> bool,
 ) -> bool {
 	let is_disputed = vote_state.is_disputed();
 	let is_included = scraper.is_candidate_included(candidate_hash);
 	let is_backed = scraper.is_candidate_backed(candidate_hash);
 	let is_confirmed = vote_state.is_confirmed();
+	let all_invalid_votes_disabled = vote_state.invalid_votes_all_disabled(is_disabled);
+	let ignore_disabled = !is_confirmed && all_invalid_votes_disabled;
 
-	is_disputed && !is_included && !is_backed && !is_confirmed
+	(is_disputed && !is_included && !is_backed && !is_confirmed) || ignore_disabled
 }
 
 /// Tell dispute-distribution to send all our votes.

polkadot/node/core/dispute-coordinator/src/participation/tests.rs

@@ -372,7 +372,6 @@ fn cannot_participate_if_cannot_recover_validation_code() {
 		let mut participation = Participation::new(sender, Metrics::default());
 		activate_leaf(&mut ctx, &mut participation, 10).await.unwrap();
 		participate(&mut ctx, &mut participation).await.unwrap();
-
 		recover_available_data(&mut ctx_handle).await;
 
 		assert_matches!(