Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure code upgrade delay is at least one session long. #977

Open
rphmeier opened this issue Feb 17, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Ensure code upgrade delay is at least one session long. #977

rphmeier opened this issue Feb 17, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@rphmeier
Copy link
Contributor

rphmeier commented Feb 17, 2021

This will let us query code from the chain for disputes in all cases. The first part of this issue is documentation - documenting this in the guide and also in the code of HostConfiguration.

@ECJ222
Copy link

ECJ222 commented Mar 23, 2022

Hi @rphmeier,

From reading the description of this issue, I can tell this has to do with the minimum_validation_upgrade_delay and validation_upgrade_delay types.

If yes, can I attempt the issue 💪?

Please, if I'm wrong, please let me know so I can dig a little bit deeper to understand the issue better.

@Sophia-Gold Sophia-Gold transferred this issue from paritytech/polkadot Aug 24, 2023
claravanstaden pushed a commit to Snowfork/polkadot-sdk that referenced this issue Dec 8, 2023
serban300 pushed a commit to serban300/polkadot-sdk that referenced this issue Mar 26, 2024
* Add Rococo and Wococo types to common.json

* Add Rococo/Wococo specific JSON definitions

* Add Rococo/Wococo support to types build script

* Get updated type definitions from build script

* Split bridge-pair specific definitions from `common.json`

* Get new type definitions from build script

* Make Wococo types reference Rococo types

Types in Wococo should always match those of Rococo since they use
the same runtime.

* Use default Header type for Rococo and Wococo headers

* Build new Rococo and Wococo type definitions
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants