You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for maintaining this excellent repository! I found a minor issue with the requirements.txt file that might cause conflicts for users with newer versions of Langchain. I'd be happy to submit a pull request to update it, as I'm sure you're busy. If that's not helpful, please point me to another issue suitable for a novice.
When trying to use RAPTOR alongside newer versions of Langchain, I encountered a dependency conflict due to outdated versions of openai and tiktoken in the requirements.txt file.
Specifically, the file specifies:
openai==1.3.3
tiktoken==0.5.1
However, newer Langchain versions require more recent versions of these packages. This could lead to errors for other users trying to set up the project.
Would it be possible to update the requirements.txt to use compatible versions? For example:
openai>=1.24.0,<2.0.0
tiktoken<1,>=0.5.2
Thanks for your consideration.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for maintaining this excellent repository! I found a minor issue with the requirements.txt file that might cause conflicts for users with newer versions of Langchain. I'd be happy to submit a pull request to update it, as I'm sure you're busy. If that's not helpful, please point me to another issue suitable for a novice.
When trying to use RAPTOR alongside newer versions of Langchain, I encountered a dependency conflict due to outdated versions of
openai
andtiktoken
in therequirements.txt
file.Specifically, the file specifies:
openai==1.3.3
tiktoken==0.5.1
However, newer Langchain versions require more recent versions of these packages. This could lead to errors for other users trying to set up the project.
Would it be possible to update the
requirements.txt
to use compatible versions? For example:openai>=1.24.0,<2.0.0
tiktoken<1,>=0.5.2
Thanks for your consideration.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: