You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@satishgn, i would like to dive deeper and find the issue with this. I see that we have this function (Multicast_Presence_Announcement) available. What's the difference between this and calling the sendto()?
Opps. I didn't realized it's called in the Multicast_Presence_Announcement. Will test further!
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@satishgn, seems like a delayMicroseconds(50) after calling `sendto() will not lead to a hard fault. At least that's what i found out when testing this....
I'm thinking that the sendto() is being called too rapidly which causes some overflow of the socket buffer? Might need to explore checking the return value or something before the next call instead of have a simple for loop
5e18860
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@satishgn, i would like to dive deeper and find the issue with this. I see that we have this function (Multicast_Presence_Announcement
) available. What's the difference between this and calling thesendto()
?Opps. I didn't realized it's called in the
Multicast_Presence_Announcement
. Will test further!5e18860
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@satishgn, seems like a
delayMicroseconds(50)
after calling `sendto() will not lead to a hard fault. At least that's what i found out when testing this....I'm thinking that the
sendto()
is being called too rapidly which causes some overflow of the socket buffer? Might need to explore checking the return value or something before the next call instead of have a simple for loop