Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Setting allowsRangedSelection to false causes unexpected selection behaviour #1122

Closed
adam-alphero opened this issue Aug 25, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Setting allowsRangedSelection to false causes unexpected selection behaviour #1122

adam-alphero opened this issue Aug 25, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees
@patchthecode
Labels
Already Fixed on Master Branch

Comments

@adam-alphero
Copy link

(Required) Version Number:
v8.0.0 (Present in 8.0.1 and master branch also)

Description

When JTACMonthView.allowsRangedSelection is set to false (its default) its didSet sets the collection view property allowsMultipleSelection to true, which shouldn't and it therefore causes unexpected behaviour.

Steps To Reproduce

When setting up the calendar do: calendarView.allowsRangedSelection = false

Expected Behavior

That setting allowsRangedSelection to false would not allow ranged selection

Additional Context
patchthecode added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 19, 2019
@patchthecode
removed negative behavior
503ebe0 
#1122
@patchthecode patchthecode self-assigned this Oct 19, 2019
@patchthecode
Copy link
Owner

fixed on master branch

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 28, 2019 •
edited by ghost

This issue still persists in version 8.0.2. Giving unexpected behaviour for range selection

@patchthecode
Copy link
Owner

patchthecode commented Nov 28, 2019 •
edited

can you try master branch?
I am not sure it this change made it to version 8.0.2
I'll have to check.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@patchthecode patchthecode

Labels
Already Fixed on Master Branch
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@patchthecode @adam-alphero