Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PAYARA-3440 EJB REST based remoting #3758

Merged
merged 18 commits into from Feb 26, 2019
Merged

PAYARA-3440 EJB REST based remoting #3758

merged 18 commits into from Feb 26, 2019

Conversation

arjantijms
Copy link
Contributor

Some small amount of cleaning ahead of actual commits

@arjantijms arjantijms self-assigned this Feb 21, 2019
@arjantijms arjantijms added this to the 5.191 milestone Feb 21, 2019
@arjantijms
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jenkins test please

@Pandrex247
Copy link
Member

Jenkins test please

@Pandrex247
Copy link
Member

Jenkins test please

@arjantijms
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jenkins test please

@arjantijms arjantijms changed the title PAYARA-3440 Formatting and variable renaming only PAYARA-3440 EJB REST based remoting Feb 25, 2019
@Pandrex247
Copy link
Member

Jenkins test please

@arjantijms arjantijms marked this pull request as ready for review February 25, 2019 14:45
Copy link
Member

@Pandrex247 Pandrex247 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

More eyebrow raisers

Conflicts:
	nucleus/admin/template/pom.xml
	nucleus/admin/template/src/main/assembly/nucleus-domain.xml
@arjantijms
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jenkins test please

@arjantijms
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jenkins test please

@Pandrex247
Copy link
Member

Jenkins test please

@arjantijms arjantijms merged commit ba656df into payara:master Feb 26, 2019
@arjantijms arjantijms deleted the PAYARA-3440-remote-ejb branch February 26, 2019 20:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants