You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm comfortable with the original QuantLib C++ projects and all the patterns that it uses (and there are a lot of them), e.g. the LazyObject. I'm starting out with a new MIT-licensed actuarial library and I want to write it in Julia, but borrowing many of the concepts from QuantLib. But I also want to follow propery Julia patterns. I don't know enough Julia yet to know what those correct patterns are. So I'd like to know whether you consider this QuantLib.jl to be correctly implemented according to the latest Julia standards. If so, that would be great and I'd be able to use it as a base for my project (which I hope you don't mind).
thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
This is going to be an odd question.
I'm comfortable with the original QuantLib C++ projects and all the patterns that it uses (and there are a lot of them), e.g. the
LazyObject
. I'm starting out with a new MIT-licensed actuarial library and I want to write it in Julia, but borrowing many of the concepts from QuantLib. But I also want to follow propery Julia patterns. I don't know enough Julia yet to know what those correct patterns are. So I'd like to know whether you consider this QuantLib.jl to be correctly implemented according to the latest Julia standards. If so, that would be great and I'd be able to use it as a base for my project (which I hope you don't mind).thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: