Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for other providers like s3fs? #3

Open
pearcec opened this issue Jul 31, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Add support for other providers like s3fs? #3

pearcec opened this issue Jul 31, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@pearcec
Copy link

pearcec commented Jul 31, 2015

This is a really well written module. I modified it to work with s3fs. But I think we could make the both work side by side with an additional parameter. Would you be interested in a pull request if I did the work?

@pcfens
Copy link
Owner

pcfens commented Aug 1, 2015

That would be awesome - I'd love to add s3fs support if we can do it in a way that makes sense.

@pearcec
Copy link
Author

pearcec commented Aug 2, 2015

The defined type is fundamentally called the same way. We would need to
pass a parameter to inform whether it was s3fs or yas3fs. Inside the
packaging is slightly different. The init scripts are slightly different.
Let me take a crack at it.

On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Phil Fenstermacher <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

That would be awesome - I'd love to add s3fs support if we can do it in a
way that makes sense.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#3 (comment).

Christian

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants