Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: update implementation of PEP 639 #120

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 29, 2022
Merged

fix: update implementation of PEP 639 #120

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 29, 2022

Conversation

frostming
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@frostming frostming merged commit aa7aecb into master Aug 29, 2022
@frostming frostming deleted the fix/pep639-update branch August 29, 2022 10:27
@pawamoy
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor

pawamoy commented Aug 29, 2022

So, PEP 639 specifies License-Expression and License-File, but the field in pyproject.toml should be kept as license, right? Which was not the case previously when you added the license-expression field to keep backward compatibility?

@frostming
Copy link
Contributor Author

So, PEP 639 specifies License-Expression and License-File, but the field in pyproject.toml should be kept as license, right? Which was not the case previously when you added the license-expression field to keep backward compatibility?

It used to be license-expression, and changed to license in a following revision.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants