-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add spacecraft state information and Ralph/LEISA details #12
Conversation
…ze conversion constant class
build/development/2510fb68d5d5df03d6ee65e75ec7946e4f3fcea6/1.21.0.0/PDS4_NH_1L00_1000.sch
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's a problem here with explicit local directory references that need to be removed. Also needs detailed review and resolution with other versions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adding this to the general "doc/regression cleanup" task.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Have to think about this - this is changing an existing regression test, which should NEVER happen.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Another changed regression test...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We'll talk about the best way to deal with documents and regression tests without making anyone's life miserable...
Yes. I'll merge them in that order, but I don't see any reference to LEISA
in the document updates in either branch. I'm wondering how they are going
to spontaneously appear. Did I miss something? Or maybe there are no actual
LEISA classes yet, and thus nothing to mock up...
…-Anne.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 6:10 PM Caden Gobat ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
------------------------------
On docs/source/detailed/outline.rst
<#12 (comment)>
:
The way I did these two PRs is a little weird in that this one branches
off of #11 <#11>, so
all of #11 <#11>'s
changes are here as well. When #11
<#11> gets merged, it
will work out and then only the new stuff here will appear in the change
set.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#12 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADBV2QEC64N7NCZKBN7G4PTY2SIM5AVCNFSM6AAAAABEFYGJF2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMYTSNRXGQ2TGNBWGI>
.
You are receiving this because your review was requested.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Right, I was just pointing out that most of your comments along the lines of " |
Nope, should be good to go. Thanks! |
Summary
Adds
Spacecraft_State
,LEISA_Details
, andRalph_Details
classes, plus associated attributes.NOTE: this PR's source branch builds on the
proposed-changes
branch, and should only be merged after #11 so as to avoid weirdness.Test Data and/or Report
The
Spacecraft_State
class has been added to the existing MVIC test labels (see 91b2e94), and everything builds/passes as expected.Related Issues
Builds on pull request #11. Other than that, no associated issues.