Don't implement property-container

[jexp]

It' a broken abstraction over the wire. And it binds your library to neo4j-embedded which it shouldn't be.

Use a cleaner implementation if you really want to support nodes and relationships. But mostly you'll be fine using maps for both. After all the metadata is not returned from the tx-endpoint. And the old "REST" representation shouldn't be used anyway as it is super wasteful.

[pdtyreus]

Thanks Michael. I just pushed a branch that replaces the PropertyContainer interface with a new DetachedPropertyContainer interface. The new interface has no reference to the GraphDatabaseService. Let me know if this is closer to what you had in mind.

[jexp]

So you can actually remove the neo4j dependency? I mean labels don't have to be exposed remotely. Just a string is good enough.

[pdtyreus]

I get what you're saying now. No need to bind this to the embedded API at all.