Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update issue templates #103

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 10, 2019
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
80 changes: 80 additions & 0 deletions .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
---
name: Bug report
about: Create a report to help us improve
title: ''
labels: ''
assignees: ''

---
**Instructions**
Please include a detailed Title above. Next, please complete the following sections below:
* Bug Description
* Impacts
* Steps To Reproduce
* Expected Behavior
* Screenshots (optional)
* Host Environment (optional)
* Additional Context (optional)

Finally, press the 'Submit new issue' button. The Core Team will evaluate and prioritize your Bug Report for future development.

**Bug Description**
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.

**Porting from Bitshares or other Graphene forks**

Corresponding issues:

- [FILL in issue1]
- [FILL in any other detail]

Corresponding PR:

- [fill in corresponding PR link]

**Impacts**
Describe which portion(s) of Peerplays may be impacted by this bug. Please tick at least one box.
- [ ] API (the application programming interface)
- [ ] Build (the build process or something prior to compiled code)
- [ ] CLI (the command line wallet)
- [ ] Deployment (the deployment process after building such as Docker, Gitlab, etc.)
- [ ] P2P (the peer-to-peer network for transaction/block propagation)
- [ ] Performance (system or user efficiency, etc.)
- [ ] Protocol (the blockchain logic, consensus, validation, etc.)
- [ ] Security (the security of system or user data, etc.)
- [ ] UX (the User Experience)
- [ ] Other (please add below)


**Steps To Reproduce**
Steps to reproduce the behavior (example outlined below):
1. Execute API call '...'
2. Using JSON payload '...'
3. Received response '...'
4. See error in screenshot

**Expected Behavior**
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

**Screenshots (optional)**
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain process flow and behavior.

**Host Environment**
Please provide details about the host environment. Much of this information can be found running: `witness_node --version`.
- Host OS: [e.g. Ubuntu 18.04 LTS]
- Host Physical RAM [e.g. 4GB]
- Peerplays Version
- OpenSSL Version: [e.g. 1.1.0g]
- Boost Version: [e.g. 1.67.0]

**Additional Context (optional)**
Add any other context about the problem here.

## PBSA / Developer tasks

- [ ] Evaluate / Prioritize Bug Report
- [ ] Refine User Stories / Requirements
- [ ] Define Test Cases
- [ ] Design / Develop Solution
- [ ] Perform QA/Testing
- [ ] Update Documentation
42 changes: 42 additions & 0 deletions .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/build_error.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
---
name: Build Error
about: Create a detailed report about an error encountered during the Peerplays build process.

---

**Instructions**
Please include a detailed Title above. Next, please complete the following sections below:
* Build Error
* Build Environment
* Steps To Reproduce
* Console Logs (optional)

Finally, press the 'Submit new issue' button. The developers/PBSA Team will evaluate and prioritize your Bug Report for future development.

**Build Error Description**
A clear and concise description of what the build error is.

**Build Environment**
Details about the build environment, including the relevant required libraries. Much of this information can be found in the `CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log`.
- Host OS: [e.g. Ubuntu 18.04 LTS]
- Host Physical RAM [e.g. 4GB]
- Source Branch/Tag: [e.g. master or 2.0.180425]
- OpenSSL Version: [e.g. 1.1.0g]
- Boost Version: [e.g. 1.65.1]
- C++ Compiler: [e.g. gcc version 4.8.5]

**Steps To Reproduce**
Steps to reproduce the behavior (example outlined below):
1. Using installation guide from this URL...
2. This is my complete build script...
3. It fails at this step with the following output...
4. See the error in the console log below...

**Console Logs (optional)**
Please provide the full console log, including all commands entered and their output. This will allow detailed troubleshooting.

## CORE TEAM TASK LIST
- [ ] Evaluate `Build Error`
- [ ] Provide build guidance
- [ ] <OR> Create `Bug Report`

43 changes: 43 additions & 0 deletions .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
---
name: Feature Request
about: Suggest an idea for the Peerplays Community & PBSA Team to evaluate and prioritize for development.

---

**Instructions**
Please include a detailed Title above. Next, please complete the following sections below:
* User Story
* Impacts
* Additional Context (optional)

Finally, press the 'Submit new issue' button. The Core Team will evaluate and prioritize your Feature Request for future development.

**User Story**
Please tell us about your feature request using the User Story format:
As a `<persona>` I want `<some functionality>` so that `<some benefit is realized>`.

At minimum, please define the `<who>`, `<what>` and `<why>` for your feature request. The `<who>` may be the system software, a component thereof, the end user, etc.; please be specific describing the context. The `<what>` details the solution your feature will provide; please describe the process flow for the functionality. The `<why>` details the benefits the feature will deliver; consider referencing alternative implementations for context.

**Impacts**
Describe which portion(s) of Peerplays that may be impacted by your request. Please tick at least one box.
- [ ] API (the application programming interface)
- [ ] Build (the build process or something prior to compiled code)
- [ ] CLI (the command line wallet)
- [ ] Deployment (the deployment process after building such as Docker, Gitlab, etc.)
- [ ] P2P (the peer-to-peer network for transaction/block propagation)
- [ ] Performance (system or user efficiency, etc.)
- [ ] Protocol (the blockchain logic, consensus, validation, etc.)
- [ ] Security (the security of system or user data, etc.)
- [ ] UX (the User Experience)
- [ ] Other (please add below)

**Additional Context (optional)**
Add any other context about your request here.

## Community / PBSA check list
- [ ] Evaluate / Prioritize Feature Request
- [ ] Refine User Stories / Requirements
- [ ] Define Test Cases
- [ ] Design / Develop Solution
- [ ] Perform QA/Testing
- [ ] Update Documentation
36 changes: 36 additions & 0 deletions .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
Please Note:


1. PRs will be reviewed from oldest to newest
2. PRs should use PR template in order to be considered for review.
3. PRs that do not have one of the PR template completely filled out with all declarations satisfied will not be reviewed.


### Purpose

(FILL ME IN) This section describes why this PR is here. Usually it would include a reference
to the tracking task that it is part or all of the solution for.

The Tracking issue is [Create the issue if non existent and fill in]

### Declarations

Check these if you believe they are true

- [ ] The code base is in a better state after this PR
- [ ] Is prepared according to the [Release Management & Versioning](https://github.com/peerplays-network/peerplays/wiki/Release-Management-&-Versioning)
- [ ] The level of testing this PR includes is appropriate
- [ ] All tests pass using the self-service CI/Gitlab. (TODO)
- [ ] Changes to the API is documented
- [ ] Testing steps for the QA team / community is shared


### Reviewers

(FILL ME IN) Reviewer 1 (If possible, assign the Reviewer for the PR)

(FILL ME IN, optional) Any additional notes to reviewers or testers.

### FYIs

(FILL ME IN, Optional) Names of anyone else you wish to be notified of