You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be great if there were an option to not put the directories first. The current default behavior is different than the behavior of ls, which makes it kind of confusing. We have these fancy icons and colors so it's already easy to tell which items are directories!
Current behavior:
drwxr-xr-x user group - Tue Dec 4 20:27:57 2018 Afolder
drwxr-xr-x user group - Tue Dec 4 20:27:51 2018 Bfolder
drwxr-xr-x user group - Fri Jan 11 19:47:11 2019 Zfolder
.rw-r--r-- user group 6 KB Fri Jan 11 18:56:06 2019 Afile
.rw-r--r-- user group 97 B Sat Nov 4 18:14:08 2017 Bfile
.rw-r--r-- user group 88 B Sat Nov 4 18:14:13 2017 Zfile
desired behavior:
.rw-r--r-- user group 6 KB Fri Jan 11 18:56:06 2019 Afile
drwxr-xr-x user group - Tue Dec 4 20:27:57 2018 Afolder
.rw-r--r-- user group 97 B Sat Nov 4 18:14:08 2017 Bfile
drwxr-xr-x user group - Tue Dec 4 20:27:51 2018 Bfolder
.rw-r--r-- user group 88 B Sat Nov 4 18:14:13 2017 Zfile
drwxr-xr-x user group - Fri Jan 11 19:47:11 2019 Zfolder
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm agree that it could be nice to add this option in order to let the users choose. I think that a possible solution would be to make the option as following:
--directory <order>... Where the directories will be ordered [default: unordered] [possible values: first, unordered, last]
It would be great if there were an option to not put the directories first. The current default behavior is different than the behavior of
ls
, which makes it kind of confusing. We have these fancy icons and colors so it's already easy to tell which items are directories!Current behavior:
desired behavior:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: