Provide musl libc compatibility#696
Conversation
With musl and POSIX, they're signed. With glibc, they're unsigned.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #696 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 82.93% 82.94%
=======================================
Files 62 62
Lines 15926 15950 +24
=======================================
+ Hits 13209 13229 +20
- Misses 2717 2721 +4
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
sanmai-NL
left a comment
sanmai-NL
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@folkertdev Maybe you want to revert the merge pending a review on the safety aspect.
| timespec.tv_sec += offset_secs as libc::time_t; | ||
| timespec.tv_sec += { | ||
| // this looks a little strange. it is to work around the `libc::time_t` type being | ||
| // deprectated for musl in rust's libc. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it's better to explicitly silence this warning instead. There's no recommended migration path. It's questionable whether the deprecation will be upheld. See: rust-lang/libc#1848
(Typo: deprecated.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yeah I read the issue, and ... it's really unclear what they actually want to happen there. it must eventually be changed because that is just what musl expects now, right? I'll amend this to ignore the warning, and link to the issue
2 participants
Musl libc is a popular alternative to glibc. It was designed for simplicity, correctness and efficiency. It has some slight incompatibilities with glibc.
Musl libc is used by e.g., Alpine Linux and Gentoo as overlay. Alpine Linux is a popular OS for container images.
This change also allows for compilation to statically linked binaries.