Skip to content

Issues: peppelinux/draft-demarco-oauth-status-assertions

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

18 Open 25 Closed
18 Open 25 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Unlinkability and Reusability of Status Assertions
#75 opened Jun 12, 2024 by peppelinux
1
[Draft Name Change] OAuth vs SPICE Status Assertions
#74 opened Jun 12, 2024 by peppelinux
More explaination about the requirement about revocations verification
#73 opened Jun 12, 2024 by peppelinux
CBOR structure
#72 opened Jun 12, 2024 by peppelinux
1
Not all credentials expire.
#71 opened Jun 12, 2024 by peppelinux
Detailed Validity Periods
#70 opened Jun 12, 2024 by OR13
Sequence Diagram documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
#69 opened Jun 11, 2024 by OR13
why cnf is required in the status assertion object? under-discussion
#68 opened Jun 11, 2024 by peppelinux
@peppelinux
1
credential_hash within the status.status_assertion invalid This doesn't seem right
#66 opened Jun 11, 2024 by peppelinux
@peppelinux
1
[Requirements] Multiple status assertion for a single credential
#60 opened May 25, 2024 by peppelinux
Move all the comparison with Status List in an issue and remove them from the specs
#50 opened May 20, 2024 by peppelinux
1
@peppelinux
3
Move ECHR and GDP links to informative references
#44 opened May 14, 2024 by peppelinux
Reconsider PoP mechanism to get a new status attestation
#32 opened Apr 11, 2024 by paulbastian
@peppelinux
4
eIDAS II Regulation requirements from Art. 5a(16)
#31 opened Apr 2, 2024 by peppelinux
Missing validation steps for verifiers
#29 opened Mar 19, 2024 by awoie
2
Define use case for this status attestation mechanism question Further information is requested wontfix This will not be worked on
#28 opened Mar 19, 2024 by awoie
2
OID4VCI metadata should not be defined in a standalone draft
#27 opened Mar 19, 2024 by awoie
Define Mechanism for Verifiers to Request Fresh Status Attestations enhancement New feature or request out-of-scope wontfix This will not be worked on
#22 opened Feb 28, 2024 by peppelinux
1
ProTip! Add no:assignee to see everything that’s not assigned.