Merge pull request #123 from tbrowder/texas

changes for Texas => ASCII

S02-bits.pod

@@ -927,7 +927,7 @@ as the fundamental unit rather than codepoints, this has some implications
 regarding efficient implementation. It is suggested that all graphemes be
 translated on input to unique grapheme numbers and represented as integers
 within some kind of uniform array for fast substr access.  For those
-graphemes that have a precomposed form, use of that codepoint is suggested. 
+graphemes that have a precomposed form, use of that codepoint is suggested.
 (Note that this means Latin-1 can still be represented internally with 8-bit
 integers.)
 
@@ -2195,7 +2195,7 @@ list, so does not flatten in flat context.
 
 When an argument is bound to a parameter, the behavior depends on whether
 the parameter is "flattening" or "argumentative".  Positional parameters and
-slice parameters are argumentative 
+slice parameters are argumentative
 and just return the next syntactic argument
 without flattening.  (A slice differs from an ordinary positional
 parameter in being "slurpy", that is, it is intended to fetch multiple
@@ -3580,7 +3580,7 @@ you can suppress the error by putting a space inside: C<< < > >>.
 
 Much like the relationship between single quotes and double quotes, single
 angles do not interpolate while double angles do.  The double angles may be
-written either with French quotes, C<«$foo @bar[]»>, or with "Texas" quotes,
+written either with French quotes, C<«$foo @bar[]»>, or with ASCII quotes,
 C<<< <<$foo @bar[]>> >>>, as the ASCII workaround.  The implicit split is
 done after interpolation, but respects quotes in a shell-like fashion, so
 that C<«'$foo' "@bar[]"»> is guaranteed to produce a list of two "words"

S99-glossary.pod

@@ -2538,13 +2538,13 @@ L<tail call> optimization.
 
 The Perl 6 test suite is L</roast>
 
-=head2 Texas operator
+=head2 ASCII operator
 
-The ASCII variant of a non-ASCII Unicode operator or symbol.  So described
-because "Everything's bigger in Texas."  For instance, C<<< >>+<< >>> is the
-"Texas" form of the C<»+«> hyper-addition operator, and C<(elem)>
+The ASCII variant of a non-ASCII Unicode operator or symbol.
+For instance, C<<< >>+<< >>> is the
+"ASCII" form of the C<»+«> hyper-addition operator, and C<(elem)>
 corresponds to the C<∈> ("Is this an element of that set?") operator that
-comes from set theory.  Texas operators are a workaround to the problem that
+comes from set theory.  ASCII operators are a workaround to the problem that
 people don't know how to type Unicode yet.  Culturally, while we encourage
 people to use the Unicode symbols in a vague sort of way, we do not
 disparage the use of the ASCII variants.  Well, maybe just a little...