Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Set operators are not documented #25

Open
moritz opened this issue Dec 17, 2012 · 2 comments
Open

Set operators are not documented #25

moritz opened this issue Dec 17, 2012 · 2 comments

Comments

@moritz
Copy link
Contributor

moritz commented Dec 17, 2012

The Set operators and their Texan variants like (-) are misisng from S03, and currently we don't really know what precedence they should have (junctive?)
@timo
Copy link
Contributor

timo commented Dec 25, 2013

the table near the beginning of the document now has a bunch of set operations in the examples, both texas variants and unicodey variants.

the set operations are all junctive and/or or chaining infix (for (<) and friends)

I'm thinking of introducing a section on set operators between Junctive Operators and Comparison Semantics.

@timo
Copy link
Contributor

timo commented Dec 25, 2013

i've started work with a tiny piece of text in the branch S03-set-operators

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@moritz @timo