Set operators are not documented #25

Open
moritz opened this Issue Dec 17, 2012 · 2 comments

Projects

None yet

2 participants

@moritz
Member
moritz commented Dec 17, 2012

The Set operators and their Texan variants like (-) are misisng from S03, and currently we don't really know what precedence they should have (junctive?)

@timo
Member
timo commented Dec 25, 2013

the table near the beginning of the document now has a bunch of set operations in the examples, both texas variants and unicodey variants.

the set operations are all junctive and/or or chaining infix (for (<) and friends)

I'm thinking of introducing a section on set operators between Junctive Operators and Comparison Semantics.

@timo
Member
timo commented Dec 25, 2013

i've started work with a tiny piece of text in the branch S03-set-operators

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment