Share setports logic for defn/decl #392
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Right now circuits declared using
m.DeclareCircuit
do not have attributes corresponding to their ports, so the following simple test fails:with
The logic to set the port attributes is contained with
DefineCircuitKind.__new__
, so it's only used for definitions, whereas inCircuitKind.__new__
the interface is never instantiated nor issetports
called.These changes move the
cls.interface = cls.IO(...)
instantiation andsetports
logic toCircuitKind.__new__
so both definitions and declarations have the port attributes set.This also resolves the issue with mismatched polarities with definitions/declarations and their
interface
attribute. This test fails before these changeswith