Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stacks: Option to configure the time threshold used to stack timelapse photos #1446

Open
anaxmedia opened this issue Jul 24, 2021 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
idea Feedback wanted / feature request

Comments

@anaxmedia
Copy link

I shoot a lot of timelapses and typically I use the auto stacking capability in Lightroom based on capture time and interval time and it works 95% of the time. I see there is stacking in PhotoPrism but is there any way to setup these photos that are part of a timelapse set to auto stack on import/index in PhotoPrism? Or the ability to exclude them from being indexed/imported with keywords/file names? They really cloud my albums.

@lastzero
Copy link
Member

Stacking is enabled, but these timelapse photos are not recognized? What's the time difference between each shot?

@anaxmedia
Copy link
Author

Yes that’s correct. Time difference is usually 5 seconds sometimes 10 seconds.

@lastzero
Copy link
Member

That makes sense as PhotoPrism currently only stacks pictures taken within one second. They would also be stacked if they share the same image / document ID, but that's probably not the case as well. Sound like we need to add settings for the interval time, or implement manual stacking?

@lastzero
Copy link
Member

Can you provide us with example files for testing? If you like also via email / link to hello@photoprism.app 👍

@lastzero lastzero self-assigned this Jul 24, 2021
@lastzero lastzero added the idea Feedback wanted / feature request label Jul 24, 2021
@lastzero lastzero changed the title Auto stacking for interval/timelapse photos? Settings: Configure stacking of timelapse photos Jul 24, 2021
@anaxmedia
Copy link
Author

anaxmedia commented Jul 24, 2021

That makes sense as PhotoPrism currently only stacks pictures taken within one second. They would also be stacked if they share the same image / document ID, but that's probably not the case as well. Sound like we need to add settings for the interval time, or implement manual stacking?

That’s how Lightroom does it you can adjust the capture time interval and it increases/decreases the number of stacks. Here’s how they’ve implemented the functionality: https://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom-classic/help/grouping-photos-stacks.html

If you scroll all the way down to the bottom of the page it talks about their automatic stacking. I’m attaching 4 photos that are part of a timelapse for testing/examples. Let me know if you have any questions or need help testing anything! Thank you, you guys are doing a phenomenal job with this project.

20171231_082035_71835106

20171231_082040_623E3525

20171231_082045_AF62DBC0

20171231_082050_5441747B

@lastzero
Copy link
Member

Thanks! We'll look into this as soon as possible. On vacation next week. Need to complete facial recognition as well, so it may take a few weeks.

@kitforbes
Copy link

kitforbes commented Aug 22, 2021

Manual stacking would also be nice a option to have. I've got a few pictures of the same subject taken at random intervals over a minute or two from the same location. I'd like to group them into a single set if possible.

Edit: I've just seen that #28 has this already, so ignore me!

@graciousgrey graciousgrey changed the title Settings: Configure stacking of timelapse photos Stacks: Option to configure the time interval used to stack timelapse photos Nov 2, 2021
@graciousgrey graciousgrey changed the title Stacks: Option to configure the time interval used to stack timelapse photos Stacks: Option to configure the time threshold used to stack timelapse photos Nov 2, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
idea Feedback wanted / feature request
Projects
Status: Ideas 💭
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants