-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
People: Select multiple new faces to name them together #1679
Comments
I like this idea a lot! We might be able to do this in the scope of #271 |
Maybe grouping clusters without having to assign them a name would be a nice feature too? I.e. I have lot of "new faces" that I know who are, but can't remember the name or whatever. I can of course hide them all, but would be nice to group them together, and then hide them (as a single cluster). That would clean up the "new faces" (and also "hidden faces" over time), so that if I where to add them later, I have them all in one cluster already. That would also minimize the probability of new clusters forming of the same person. |
That would be a great feature if you can can select some new phases and set the name togehter. |
count me in with 10$ delivery fee |
I would double my membership for a year for this feature to get implemented. |
Thank you so much for your feedback! We'll keep this in mind, but need to finish the multi-user features first. So no real chance to release it before next year. |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The situation I have with my pictures is that some faces have a few big clusters and then a lot of small clusters. Everything works well, but it is a little tiresome to select these smaller clusters and name then one by one.
Describe the solution you'd like
I think it would be great to be able select clusters with check-boxes, as is possible with individual pictures in other views. It would then be possible to group these clusters and label them all in one go.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
Photoprism is great, so many many thanks to all contributors!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: