You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I just merged #22 , which did not include a point total update, which I found out when inspecting #21. In my opinion I have violated rule 309, by submitting (and merging) a pull request that did not accurately reflect the game state. Given how #311 has not passed yet, and as of now, the rules are unclear on how to resolve this. Hence I am invoking Judgement to request an answer to the following question:
As @pimotte indicates, there are no rules that currently tell us how to resolve this situation, nor are there rules that allow us to sanction a player for breaking our rules. As a result I feel the only judgement I can (begrudgingly) give is as follows:
As the breaking of the rules did not lead to a disruption of gameplay, either positive or negative, I see no need to undo the merging of the Pull Request that led us to this violation. Thus I rule that @pimotte will rectify the score totals to again reflect the current game state and no further action is taken.
I would like to take this opportunity to again highlight the need for a rule such as outlined in #18 (although it is hard to be impartial about this, since it is my pull request). Such a rule would allow us to deal with violations like this in a more impartial, objective, and streamlined manner.
As per rule 305, this issue can be closed soon, assuming no objections to this judgement are raised.
I just merged #22 , which did not include a point total update, which I found out when inspecting #21. In my opinion I have violated rule 309, by submitting (and merging) a pull request that did not accurately reflect the game state. Given how #311 has not passed yet, and as of now, the rules are unclear on how to resolve this. Hence I am invoking Judgement to request an answer to the following question:
How should the current situation be resolved?
By rule 305, @MrHug will be the judge.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: