324: Notion of guilt #33
Conversation
|
👍 |
|
無効でした。＝ (That) was invalid. |
|
That vote is not valid, let me try to make sure future votes are 😉 私はどこですか。Where am I? |
|
👍 |
1 similar comment
|
👍 |
|
Cue me figuring out all the ways to say "I voted before I was allowed" in Japanese:P |
| - The Verdict of the jury is two-fold, first the guilt of the defendant must be established, secondly the punishment. | ||
| - The jury shall first decide if the defendant is _Guilty_ of the offense or _Not Guilty_. | ||
| - If no consensus on the guilt of the defendant can be established, then a majority vote will take place. If the | ||
| majority vote is non-conclusive, the defendant will be declared Not Guilty. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Who participate in this vote?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmm yeah the jury, let me make that explicit.
|
I've clarified who votes and added the word integer in two places ;) |
|
👍 |
|
More votes are needed! |
|
Through trial, players can end up with a negative number of points atm. I guess I'm okay with that. |
|
Correct. I am also ok with that. |
|
👍 |
|
More votes are needed! |
|
Although technically speaking at that point it might be best to "get out" and "get in" of the game to restart with 0 points ;) As there is no "inactive" state of any kind ;) |
|
👍 |
|
More votes are needed! |
|
With 3 votes in favor, among 4 players, a simple majority has been achieved, so by rule 203, the suggested rule-change is adopted. As prescribed by rule 318, I will merge this pull request. |
A more refined notion of going to Trial, with a cleaner definition of Guilt.
EDIT: For clarification, this will basically make it possible for Jury to declare someone Guilty without the need to take points away as well.