-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
django-jsonfield vs jsonfield #4
Comments
@brosner what do you think about this? |
@brosner bump. i wonder if we could make the 2 or 3 different json field packages optional so people could use whatever they are already using. jsonfield and django-jsonfield share the same namespace, I think. Then there is django-json-field which has the same field name just a different package name. |
The only solution I found to this problem btw is:
This "solution" is bad for countless reasons but I don't know a better way. Do you? |
"jsonfield" is now django 1.7 compatible (https://pypi.python.org/pypi/jsonfield Version 1.0.0) --> Why does eventlog use django-jsonfield and not jsonfield? |
Any further discussion on this? |
@paltman Since Django 1.9 now has a built in jsonfield, that should be used going forward. Probably we should close this issue and begin updating any apps to use the 1.9 built-in with a ported fallback for < 1.9? |
Related to jsonfield. How to use query filter by jsonfield? Thanks |
eventlog is now using |
I would like to use jsonfield instead of django-jsonfield which works fine once it is installed but when I install eventlog after I installed jsonfield django-jsonfield will overwrite the package. This is more of a django-jsonfield issue but I was wondering if maybe eventlog could provide an option to install jsonfield instead of django-jsonfield.
I think I would change the setup.py to include an "extra" option to use jsonfield instead. What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: