Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
benchmark: add TPC-H benchmark result (#443)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
* benchmark: create tpch document

via pingcap/docs-cn#698

* benchmark: update test result

via pingcap/docs-cn@0878112

* Update tpch.md

* Add files via upload

* Update tpch.md

* Update tpch.md

* Update tpch.md

* Update tpch.md

* Update tpch.md

* Update tpch.md

* Update tpch.md

* Update tpch.md

* Update tpch.md

* Update tpch.md
  • Loading branch information
CaitinChen committed Apr 27, 2018
1 parent b856216 commit 9fc6094
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 106 additions and 0 deletions.
106 changes: 106 additions & 0 deletions benchmark/tpch.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
---
title: TiDB TPC-H 50G Performance Test Report V2.0
category: benchmark
---

# TiDB TPC-H 50G Performance Test Report

## Test purpose

This test aims to compare the performances of TiDB 1.0 and TiDB 2.0 in the OLAP scenario.

> **Note**: Different test environments might lead to different test results.
## Test environment

### Machine information

System information:

| Machine IP | Operation system | Kernel version | File system type |
|--------------|------------------------|------------------------------|--------------|
| 172.16.31.2 | Ubuntu 17.10 64bit | 4.13.0-16-generic | ext4 |
| 172.16.31.3 | Ubuntu 17.10 64bit | 4.13.0-16-generic | ext4 |
| 172.16.31.4 | Ubuntu 17.10 64bit | 4.13.0-16-generic | ext4 |
| 172.16.31.6 | CentOS 7.4.1708 64bit | 3.10.0-693.11.6.el7.x86\_64 | ext4 |
| 172.16.31.8 | CentOS 7.4.1708 64bit | 3.10.0-693.11.6.el7.x86\_64 | ext4 |
| 172.16.31.10 | CentOS 7.4.1708 64bit | 3.10.0-693.11.6.el7.x86\_64 | ext4 |

Hardware information:

| Type | Name |
|------------|------------------------------------------------------|
| CPU | 40 vCPUs, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz |
| RAM | 128GB, 16GB RDIMM * 8, 2400MT/s, dual channel, x8 bitwidth |
| DISK | Intel P4500 4T SSD * 2 |
| Network Card | 10 Gigabit Ethernet |

### TPC-H

[tidb-bench/tpch](https://github.com/pingcap/tidb-bench/tree/master/tpch)

### Cluster topology

| Machine IP | Deployment Instance |
|--------------|---------------------|
| 172.16.31.2 | TiKV \* 2 |
| 172.16.31.3 | TiKV \* 2 |
| 172.16.31.6 | TiKV \* 2 |
| 172.16.31.8 | TiKV \* 2 |
| 172.16.31.10 | TiKV \* 2 |
| 172.16.31.10 | PD \* 1 |
| 172.16.31.4 | TiDB \* 1 |

### Corresponding TiDB version information

TiDB 1.0:

| Component | Version | Commit Hash |
|--------|-------------|--------------------------------------------|
| TiDB | v1.0.9 | 4c7ee3580cd0a69319b2c0c08abdc59900df7344 |
| TiKV | v1.0.8 | 2bb923a4cd23dbf68f0d16169fd526dc5c1a9f4a |
| PD | v1.0.8 | 137fa734472a76c509fbfd9cb9bc6d0dc804a3b7 |

TiDB 2.0:

| Component | Version | Commit Hash |
|--------|-------------|--------------------------------------------|
| TiDB | v2.0.0-rc.6 | 82d35f1b7f9047c478f4e1e82aa0002abc8107e7 |
| TiKV | v2.0.0-rc.6 | 8bd5c54966c6ef42578a27519bce4915c5b0c81f |
| PD | v2.0.0-rc.6 | 9b824d288126173a61ce7d51a71fc4cb12360201 |

## Test result

| Query ID | TiDB 2.0 | TiDB 1.0 |
|-----------|--------------------|------------------|
| 1 | 33.915s | 215.305s |
| 2 | 25.575s | Nan |
| 3 | 59.631s | 196.003s |
| 4 | 30.234s | 249.919s |
| 5 | 31.666s | OOM |
| 6 | 13.111s | 118.709s |
| 7 | 31.710s | OOM |
| 8 | 31.734s | 800.546s |
| 9 | 34.211s | 630.639s |
| 10 | 30.774s | 133.547s |
| 11 | 27.692s | 78.026s |
| 12 | 27.962s | 124.641s |
| 13 | 27.676s | 174.695s |
| 14 | 19.676s | 110.602s |
| 15 | NaN | Nan |
| 16 | 24.890s | 40.529s |
| 17 | 245.796s | NaN |
| 18 | 91.256s | OOM |
| 19 | 37.615s | NaN |
| 20 | 44.167s | 212.201s |
| 21 | 31.466s | OOM |
| 22 | 31.539s | 125.471s |

![TPC-H Query Result](../media/tpch-query-result.png)

It should be notified that:

- In the diagram above, the orange bars represent the query result of Release 1.0 and the blue bars represent the query rersult of Release 2.0. The ordinate represents the processing time of queries, the shorter the better.
- Query 15 is tagged with "NaN" because VIEW is not supported in both TiDB 1.0 and 2.0 releases.
- Queries 2, 17, and 19 in the TiDB 1.0 column are tagged with "NaN" because TiDB 1.0 does not return a result for long.
- Queries 5, 7, 18, and 21 in the TiDB 1.0 column are tagged with "OOM" because the memory consumption is too high and tidb-server is killed by oom-killer.
Binary file added media/tpch-query-result.png
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.

0 comments on commit 9fc6094

Please sign in to comment.