Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sinkmanager(ticdc): add table sink wrapper #7453

Merged

Conversation

hi-rustin
Copy link
Member

@hi-rustin hi-rustin commented Oct 26, 2022

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #5928

What is changed and how it works?

  • add table sink wrapper
  • add table progress heap

This PR introduces the table sink wrapper, and it is used to emit data to the table sink. It is difficult to reuse the sink node so we have to add a new wrapper.

And we introduce a progress heap to track the fetch progress. It is a thread-safe heap.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test

Questions

Will it cause performance regression or break compatibility?

No

Do you need to update user documentation, design documentation or monitoring documentation?

No

Release note

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Oct 26, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • hicqu
  • nongfushanquan

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 26, 2022
@hi-rustin hi-rustin force-pushed the rustin-patch-sinkmanager-table-sink branch from 9c50004 to 8e67f4a Compare October 26, 2022 06:22
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 26, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #7453 (d871442) into master (f4754e1) will increase coverage by 0.0585%.
The diff coverage is 37.0919%.

Additional details and impacted files
Flag Coverage Δ
cdc 67.4261% <45.4545%> (-0.0214%) ⬇️
dm 52.0583% <0.0000%> (+0.0501%) ⬆️
engine 61.0949% <12.3456%> (+0.1263%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master      #7453        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   59.8150%   59.8735%   +0.0585%     
================================================
  Files           803        804         +1     
  Lines         92129      92398       +269     
================================================
+ Hits          55107      55322       +215     
- Misses        32213      32267        +54     
  Partials       4809       4809                

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 26, 2022
@hi-rustin hi-rustin added component/sink Sink component. area/ticdc Issues or PRs related to TiCDC. labels Oct 26, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@nongfushanquan nongfushanquan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add some comments to describe the purpose of this pr

@hi-rustin
Copy link
Member Author

Please add some comments to describe the purpose of this pr

Added. Thanks for your reminder.


// convertRowChangedEvents uses to convert RowChangedEvents to TableSinkRowChangedEvents.
// It will deal with the old value compatibility.
func convertRowChangedEvents(changefeed model.ChangeFeedID, tableID model.TableID, enableOldValue bool, events ...*model.PolymorphicEvent) ([]*model.RowChangedEvent, error) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is it reasonable to put this method in this struct?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, it will also be used to redo tasks. It is more like a util.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Oct 28, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Oct 28, 2022
@hi-rustin
Copy link
Member Author

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: bd44299

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Oct 28, 2022
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@hi-rustin: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you:

/run-all-tests

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 6ad9676 into pingcap:master Oct 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/ticdc Issues or PRs related to TiCDC. component/sink Sink component. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants