expression_filter(dm): fix updateOldExprs and updateNewExprs length not same

[lance6716]

Signed-off-by: lance6716 lance6716@gmail.com

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #7774

What is changed and how it works?

treat updateOldExprs and updateNewExprs as a whole when caching

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test

Questions

Will it cause performance regression or break compatibility?

Do you need to update user documentation, design documentation or monitoring documentation?

Release note

Fix a bug when only one of `update-old-value-expr` or `update-new-value-expr` is set for a table, it does not take effect or panic

[ti-chi-bot]

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

• D3Hunter
• asddongmen

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #7779 (020f514) into master (b0f5a0b) will increase coverage by 4.9939%.
The diff coverage is 50.9842%.

Additional details and impacted files

Flag	Coverage Δ
cdc	66.1903% <45.4326%> (?)
engine	64.3639% <ø> (+0.0794%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master      #7779        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   55.0067%   60.0006%   +4.9939%     
================================================
  Files           415        813       +398     
  Lines         52739      94044     +41305     
================================================
+ Hits          29010      56427     +27417     
- Misses        20957      32730     +11773     
- Partials       2772       4887      +2115     

[lance6716]

/cc @asddongmen @D3Hunter @buchuitoudegou

[lance6716]

/merge

[ti-chi-bot]

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 020f514

[ti-chi-bot]

@lance6716: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

[lance6716]

/run-all-tests

[lance6716]

/run-engine-integration-test

[ti-chi-bot]

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created: #7829.

[ti-chi-bot]

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created: #7830.