Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

only do auth check for TiDB (cherry-pick of #2489) #2502

Conversation

TrafalgarRicardoLu
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

This is an cherry-pick of #2489

What is changed and how it works?

Only do auth check for tables in TiDB.
We will check the catalog name of operation.
If it doesn't use tidb_catalog, we won't do auth check for it.
This check only work for select and use database

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Aug 17, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • shiyuhang0
  • xuanyu66

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@zhangyangyu
Copy link
Member

/run-all-tests

@TrafalgarRicardoLu
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@shiyuhang0
Copy link
Member

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: e08f961

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 7274a06 into pingcap:release-2.5 Aug 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants