fix pd microservice component id

[iosmanthus]

What problem does this PR solve?

close #2270

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No code

Code changes

• Has exported function/method change
• Has exported variable/fields change
• Has interface methods change
• Has persistent data change

Side effects

• Possible performance regression
• Increased code complexity
• Breaking backward compatibility

Related changes

• Need to cherry-pick to the release branch
• Need to update the documentation

Release notes:

NONE

[ti-chi-bot]

@rleungx: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -3.07% ⚠️

Comparison is base (b1557f8) 43.44% compared to head (1447347) 40.36%.

❗ Current head 1447347 differs from pull request most recent head b5f5481. Consider uploading reports for the commit b5f5481 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2272      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   43.44%   40.36%   -3.07%     
==========================================
  Files         305      266      -39     
  Lines       33169    28795    -4374     
==========================================
- Hits        14408    11623    -2785     
+ Misses      17023    15559    -1464     
+ Partials     1738     1613     -125     

Flag	Coverage Δ
tiup	15.88% <ø> (ø)
unittest	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 93 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ti-chi-bot]

@JmPotato: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[kaaaaaaang]

/lgtm

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2023-09-06 06:08:52.37999865 +0000 UTC m=+2512096.929014622: ☑️ agreed by kaaaaaaang.

[iosmanthus]

/merge

[kaaaaaaang]

/approve

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kaaaaaaang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [kaaaaaaang]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment