Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor functions to use context object #452

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Sep 3, 2023
Merged

Refactor functions to use context object #452

merged 10 commits into from
Sep 3, 2023

Conversation

jsumners
Copy link
Member

@jsumners jsumners commented Aug 30, 2023

This PR refactors all of the prettify functions to use a context object. This removes the need to keep track of all of the parsed options and other items such functions need in order to perform their work. I believe this will make the code base easier to maintain going forward, and will make PRs like #445 easier to implement.


It's not clear to me why the following block of code in 770f56a stops working when refactoring it to use the context object:

pino-pretty/index.js

Lines 117 to 122 in fa386a9

if (minimumLevel) {
const condition = useOnlyCustomProps ? opts.customLevels : customLevelNames[minimumLevel] !== undefined
const minimum = (condition ? customLevelNames[minimumLevel] : LEVEL_NAMES[minimumLevel]) || Number(minimumLevel)
const level = log[levelKey === undefined ? LEVEL_KEY : levelKey]
if (level < minimum) return
}

The short of it is that the following test starts failing:

t.test('filter some lines based on minimumLevel', (t) => {
t.plan(3)
const pretty = prettyFactory({ minimumLevel: 'info' })
const expected = [
undefined,
undefined,
`[${formattedEpoch}] INFO (${pid}): baz\n`
]
const log = pino({}, new Writable({
write (chunk, enc, cb) {
const formatted = pretty(chunk.toString())
t.equal(
formatted,
expected.shift()
)
cb()
}
}))
log.info({ msg: 'foo', level: 10 })
log.info({ msg: 'bar', level: 20 })
// only this line will be formatted
log.info({ msg: 'baz', level: 30 })
})

It starts failing because it ultimately invokes Number("info"), resulting in NaN, on line 119 of the current master code because this.customLevels defaults to an empty object. This is mysterious to me because the same default is present on the master branch.

Regardless, unrolling the conditionals is far easier to read and reason through. But I'm still likely to revisit this block before considering this PR ready.

Update: I thought it might be the same thing as this:

// This is odd. The colorizer ends up relying on the value of
// `customProperties` instead of the original `customLevels` and
// `customLevelNames`.
...this.context.customProperties

But it does not seem to be. I'm going to leave the unrolled block in place. I really don't like the conditionals nested in ternaries to begin with.

@jsumners jsumners marked this pull request as ready for review August 31, 2023 12:29
@jsumners jsumners requested a review from mcollina August 31, 2023 12:29
@jsumners
Copy link
Member Author

jsumners commented Aug 31, 2023

@mcollina in order to avoid the situation in #449 that led to having to create #453, once this and #453 are approved I will be merging in the following order:

  1. Refactor functions to use context object #452
  2. Improve jsdoc blocks #450
  3. Re-org code (retry) #453

It will negate the approvals on those issues as I move through them, but nothing will be changing other than everything coming together. I broke this up into multiple PRs in an effort to make it a least somewhat easier to review.

@jsumners
Copy link
Member Author

For what it's worth, I'm getting benchmark numbers like this with the PR:

basicLog*10000: 796.194ms
objectLog*10000: 648.642ms
coloredLog*10000: 764.881ms
customPrettifiers*10000: 767.826ms
logWithErrorObject*10000: 577.4ms
logRemappedMsgErrKeys*10000: 587.286ms
messageFormatString*10000: 967.363ms
basicLog*10000: 753.156ms
objectLog*10000: 643.996ms
coloredLog*10000: 764.156ms
customPrettifiers*10000: 798.113ms
logWithErrorObject*10000: 584.494ms
logRemappedMsgErrKeys*10000: 595.066ms
messageFormatString*10000: 982.404ms

Slightly different than the results discovered with #451. I think the maintenance benefits will far outweigh any decrease in speed.

@@ -37,42 +26,50 @@ const jsonParser = input => {
* @property {boolean} [colorizeObjects=true] Apply coloring to rendered objects
* when coloring is enabled.
* @property {boolean} [crlf=false] End lines with `\r\n` instead of `\n`.
* @property {string|null} [customColors=null] A comma separated list of colors
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This doc block got reorganized to order the properties in alphabetical order. No real change here.

@@ -84,22 +81,25 @@ const defaultOptions = {
colorize: isColorSupported,
colorizeObjects: true,
crlf: false,
customColors: null,
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same as with the doc block. Properties were reorganized to be in alphabetical order.

Comment on lines +113 to +114
const context = parseFactoryOptions(Object.assign({}, defaultOptions, options))
return pretty.bind({ ...context, context })
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All of the implementation code was moved to lib/pretty.js.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

New file that contains the original prettification code from the root index.js.

Comment on lines +51 to +76
if (this.minimumLevel) {
// We need to figure out if the custom levels has the desired minimum
// level & use that one if found. If not, determine if the level exists
// in the standard levels. In both cases, make sure we have the level
// number instead of the level name.
let condition
if (this.useOnlyCustomProps) {
condition = this.customLevels
} else {
condition = this.customLevelNames[this.minimumLevel] !== undefined
}
let minimum
if (condition) {
minimum = this.customLevelNames[this.minimumLevel]
} else {
minimum = LEVEL_NAMES[this.minimumLevel]
}
if (!minimum) {
minimum = typeof this.minimumLevel === 'string'
? LEVEL_NAMES[this.minimumLevel]
: LEVEL_NAMES[LEVELS[this.minimumLevel].toLowerCase()]
}

const level = log[this.levelKey === undefined ? LEVEL_KEY : this.levelKey]
if (level < minimum) return
}
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a change from the original code. See the PR description for details on this block.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a new file that contains the original code from prettyFactory that parsed the passed in options. This one parses the options and returns a standardized context object that we can pass around to the various prettifier functions.

@jsumners
Copy link
Member Author

jsumners commented Sep 2, 2023

@mcollina when you get a chance, please review this one.

Copy link
Member

@mcollina mcollina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

great work much needed!

@jsumners jsumners merged commit b490eb9 into improve-docs Sep 3, 2023
10 checks passed
@jsumners jsumners deleted the refactor branch September 3, 2023 11:22
jsumners added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2023
jsumners added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2023
jsumners added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2023
jsumners added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants