High severity issues in security dependency check #512

drcabral · 2019-07-04T21:28:19Z

Hi everyone,

I'm working with ktlint and i checked for dependency security issues in my project. In the latest version, ktlint presents 7 high severity issues, what i think that is a lot.

Is there any work going on to take a look and solve these problems? Thanks!

Analysis made with owasp dependency check

shashachu · 2019-07-04T21:38:34Z

Hi! It looks like this is all due to a dependency? Does that dependency have an updated version without whatever security issues?

drcabral · 2019-07-04T21:42:43Z

I'm using ktlint directly in my project, and i updated to the 0.33.0 what i'm thinking that is the last version available and stable. So, Ktlint does not have a new version without security issues i guess.

shashachu · 2019-07-04T21:56:53Z

Sorry, yes I'm one of the maintainers of the project. I was just wondering if you'd looked into solutions at all. We will be releasing 0.34.0 soon and we can aim to include a fix for this.

drcabral · 2019-07-04T22:00:49Z

Thank you!

Tapchicoma · 2019-07-05T13:54:03Z

@drcabral are this security issues raised only for latest release or releases before? And could you provide more details about this issues, like what exactly dependencies have security issues?

drcabral · 2019-07-05T14:32:33Z

Hi @Tapchicoma, I was using the version 0.29.0 and I updated to 0.33.0 thinking that the issues could be solved, but all the same issues still remained.

I can share with you the messages about the issues that the dependency check identified:

-> Ktlint-core-0.33.0.jar

Published Vulnerabilities
CVE-2019-1010260  suppress

Using ktlint to download and execute custom rulesets can result in arbitrary code execution as the served jars can be compromised by a MITM. This attack is exploitable via Man in the Middle of the HTTP connection to the artifact servers. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 0.30.0 and later; after commit 5e547b287d6c260d328a2cb658dbe6b7a7ff2261.
CVSSv2:
* Base Score: HIGH (9.3)
* Vector: /AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSSv3:
* Base Score: HIGH (8.1)
* Vector: /AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

References:
* MISC - https://github.com/shyiko/ktlint/pull/332

Vulnerable Software & Versions:
* cpe:2.3:a:ktlint_project:ktlint:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions up to (excluding) 0.30.0


-> ktlint-reporter-checkstyle-0.33.0

CVE-2019-1010260  suppress

Using ktlint to download and execute custom rulesets can result in arbitrary code execution as the served jars can be compromised by a MITM. This attack is exploitable via Man in the Middle of the HTTP connection to the artifact servers. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 0.30.0 and later; after commit 5e547b287d6c260d328a2cb658dbe6b7a7ff2261.
CVSSv2:
* Base Score: HIGH (9.3)
* Vector: /AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSSv3:
* Base Score: HIGH (8.1)
* Vector: /AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

References:
* MISC - https://github.com/shyiko/ktlint/pull/332

Vulnerable Software & Versions:
* cpe:2.3:a:ktlint_project:ktlint:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions up to (excluding) 0.30.0

CVE-2019-9658  suppress

Checkstyle before 8.18 loads external DTDs by default.
CVSSv2:
* Base Score: MEDIUM (5.0)
* Vector: /AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
CVSSv3:
* Base Score: MEDIUM (5.3)
* Vector: /AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

References:
* FEDORA - FEDORA-2019-4696630d6f
* FEDORA - FEDORA-2019-a3f67e2364
* FEDORA - FEDORA-2019-e4405b4c9f
* MISC - https://checkstyle.org/releasenotes.html#Release_8.18
* MISC - https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/6474
* MISC - https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/6478
* MISC - https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/pull/6476
* MLIST - [accumulo-notifications] 20190612 [GitHub] [accumulo-testing] milleruntime opened a new pull request #80: Update checkstyle
* MLIST - [debian-lts-announce] 20190428 [SECURITY] [DLA 1768-1] checkstyle security update
* MLIST - [james-server-dev] 20190318 [james-project] 01/03: JAMES-2693 Update com.puppycrawl.tools:checkstyle to respond to CVE-2019-9658

Vulnerable Software & Versions:
* cpe:2.3:a:checkstyle:checkstyle:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions up to (excluding) 8.18

-> ktlint-reporter-json-0.33.0

Published Vulnerabilities
CVE-2019-1010260  suppress

Using ktlint to download and execute custom rulesets can result in arbitrary code execution as the served jars can be compromised by a MITM. This attack is exploitable via Man in the Middle of the HTTP connection to the artifact servers. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 0.30.0 and later; after commit 5e547b287d6c260d328a2cb658dbe6b7a7ff2261.
CVSSv2:
* Base Score: HIGH (9.3)
* Vector: /AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSSv3:
* Base Score: HIGH (8.1)
* Vector: /AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

References:
* MISC - https://github.com/shyiko/ktlint/pull/332

Vulnerable Software & Versions:
* cpe:2.3:a:ktlint_project:ktlint:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions up to (excluding) 0.30.0

-> ktlint-reporter-plain-0.33.0

Published Vulnerabilities
CVE-2019-1010260  suppress

Using ktlint to download and execute custom rulesets can result in arbitrary code execution as the served jars can be compromised by a MITM. This attack is exploitable via Man in the Middle of the HTTP connection to the artifact servers. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 0.30.0 and later; after commit 5e547b287d6c260d328a2cb658dbe6b7a7ff2261.
CVSSv2:
* Base Score: HIGH (9.3)
* Vector: /AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSSv3:
* Base Score: HIGH (8.1)
* Vector: /AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

References:
* MISC - https://github.com/shyiko/ktlint/pull/332

Vulnerable Software & Versions:
* cpe:2.3:a:ktlint_project:ktlint:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions up to (excluding) 0.30.0

-> ktlint-ruleset-experimental-0.33.0

Published Vulnerabilities
CVE-2019-1010260  suppress

Using ktlint to download and execute custom rulesets can result in arbitrary code execution as the served jars can be compromised by a MITM. This attack is exploitable via Man in the Middle of the HTTP connection to the artifact servers. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 0.30.0 and later; after commit 5e547b287d6c260d328a2cb658dbe6b7a7ff2261.
CVSSv2:
* Base Score: HIGH (9.3)
* Vector: /AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSSv3:
* Base Score: HIGH (8.1)
* Vector: /AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

References:
* MISC - https://github.com/shyiko/ktlint/pull/332

Vulnerable Software & Versions:
* cpe:2.3:a:ktlint_project:ktlint:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions up to (excluding) 0.30.0

-> ktlint-ruleset-standard-0.33.0

Published Vulnerabilities
CVE-2019-1010260  suppress

Using ktlint to download and execute custom rulesets can result in arbitrary code execution as the served jars can be compromised by a MITM. This attack is exploitable via Man in the Middle of the HTTP connection to the artifact servers. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 0.30.0 and later; after commit 5e547b287d6c260d328a2cb658dbe6b7a7ff2261.
CVSSv2:
* Base Score: HIGH (9.3)
* Vector: /AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSSv3:
* Base Score: HIGH (8.1)
* Vector: /AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

References:
* MISC - https://github.com/shyiko/ktlint/pull/332

Vulnerable Software & Versions:
* cpe:2.3:a:ktlint_project:ktlint:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions up to (excluding) 0.30.0

-> ktlint-test-0.33.0

Published Vulnerabilities
CVE-2019-1010260  suppress

Using ktlint to download and execute custom rulesets can result in arbitrary code execution as the served jars can be compromised by a MITM. This attack is exploitable via Man in the Middle of the HTTP connection to the artifact servers. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 0.30.0 and later; after commit 5e547b287d6c260d328a2cb658dbe6b7a7ff2261.
CVSSv2:
* Base Score: HIGH (9.3)
* Vector: /AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSSv3:
* Base Score: HIGH (8.1)
* Vector: /AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

References:
* MISC - https://github.com/shyiko/ktlint/pull/332

Vulnerable Software & Versions:
* cpe:2.3:a:ktlint_project:ktlint:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions up to (excluding) 0.30.0

shashachu · 2019-07-05T15:10:24Z

Ah ok I remember this issue. I believe the vulnerability has actually been fixed, but the process to mark it has such hasn't been resolved. @JLLeitschuh did it ever get resubmitted?

Tapchicoma · 2019-07-05T16:12:17Z

Also should be not a problem if #451 will be resolved.

shashachu · 2019-07-05T16:30:37Z

I'm pretty unfamiliar with the process, but it does look like our assigned CVE number (https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-1010260) does say it should be fixed in 0.30.0 and later; so not sure what's missing as far as the reporting.

Fleshgrinder · 2019-07-05T20:08:50Z

The vulnerabilities from dependencies remain. I think the easiest solution for ktlint would be to simply upgrade as much as possible to the latest version.

shashachu · 2019-07-05T20:48:33Z

The vulnerabilities from dependencies remain. I think the easiest solution for ktlint would be to simply upgrade as much as possible to the latest version.

Ah, I didn't see this one:


Checkstyle before 8.18 loads external DTDs by default.

This is a bit confusing because I don't believe we actually include checkstyle as a dependency, we just output a checkstyle-formatted report. Does it just want us to require a higher checkstyle version?

override fun afterAll() {
        out.println("""<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>""")
        out.println("""<checkstyle version="8.0">""")
        for ((file, errList) in acc.entries.sortedBy { it.key }) {
            out.println("""	<file name="${file.escapeXMLAttrValue()}">""")
            for ((line, col, ruleId, detail) in errList) {
                out.println(
                    """		<error line="$line" column="$col" severity="error" message="${
                    detail.escapeXMLAttrValue()
                    }" source="$ruleId" />"""
                )
            }
            out.println("""	</file>""")
        }
        out.println("""</checkstyle>""")
    }

JLLeitschuh · 2019-07-05T21:44:26Z

Heh.
That checkstyle vulnerability was also discovered by me.

_{Sent with GitHawk}

JLLeitschuh · 2019-07-05T21:49:18Z

The vulnerability in ktlint itself should be resolved as of 0.30.0.

That finding actually spawned this bit of research that's now public:

Want to take over the Java ecosystem? All you need is a MITM!

shashachu · 2019-07-06T02:50:34Z

@JLLeitschuh do you know why we're getting flagged for the checkstyle vulnerability? We don't actually bring it in as a dependency. Is it just the checkstyle version we're writing out in the checkstyle reporter?

Fleshgrinder · 2019-07-06T10:34:50Z

I added the OWASP Dependency Check plugin to the project in #514 and running it directly against the project doesn‘t trigger the checkstyle vulnerability. However, there are others:

shashachu · 2019-07-10T21:12:03Z

When we remove the MavenDependencyResolver the Guava, HttpClient and Plexus Utils dependencies will go away. #451

hosamaly · 2019-09-10T10:19:32Z

Hi. It looks like this ticket is ready to be resolved, now that #566 has been merged. Could we expect v0.35.0 soon?

Fleshgrinder mentioned this issue Jul 6, 2019

Added OWASP Dependency Check #514

Closed

Tapchicoma closed this as completed Nov 27, 2019

ghost mentioned this issue Sep 19, 2022

High severity issues in security dependency check - False Positive twitter/compose-rules#73

Open

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

High severity issues in security dependency check #512

High severity issues in security dependency check #512

drcabral commented Jul 4, 2019

shashachu commented Jul 4, 2019

drcabral commented Jul 4, 2019

shashachu commented Jul 4, 2019

drcabral commented Jul 4, 2019

Tapchicoma commented Jul 5, 2019

drcabral commented Jul 5, 2019

shashachu commented Jul 5, 2019 •

edited

Tapchicoma commented Jul 5, 2019

shashachu commented Jul 5, 2019

Fleshgrinder commented Jul 5, 2019

shashachu commented Jul 5, 2019 •

edited

JLLeitschuh commented Jul 5, 2019 •

edited

JLLeitschuh commented Jul 5, 2019

shashachu commented Jul 6, 2019

Fleshgrinder commented Jul 6, 2019

shashachu commented Jul 10, 2019 •

edited

hosamaly commented Sep 10, 2019 •

edited

High severity issues in security dependency check #512

High severity issues in security dependency check #512

Comments

drcabral commented Jul 4, 2019

shashachu commented Jul 4, 2019

drcabral commented Jul 4, 2019

shashachu commented Jul 4, 2019

drcabral commented Jul 4, 2019

Tapchicoma commented Jul 5, 2019

drcabral commented Jul 5, 2019

shashachu commented Jul 5, 2019 • edited

Tapchicoma commented Jul 5, 2019

shashachu commented Jul 5, 2019

Fleshgrinder commented Jul 5, 2019

shashachu commented Jul 5, 2019 • edited

JLLeitschuh commented Jul 5, 2019 • edited

JLLeitschuh commented Jul 5, 2019

shashachu commented Jul 6, 2019

Fleshgrinder commented Jul 6, 2019

shashachu commented Jul 10, 2019 • edited

hosamaly commented Sep 10, 2019 • edited

shashachu commented Jul 5, 2019 •

edited

shashachu commented Jul 5, 2019 •

edited

JLLeitschuh commented Jul 5, 2019 •

edited

shashachu commented Jul 10, 2019 •

edited

hosamaly commented Sep 10, 2019 •

edited