[DNM] Apply black for all codebase #221
Conversation
|
That's a lot of quotation mark changes! A few of the changes look questionable (like removing the brackets from |
|
I think the majority of the changes are just changing single quotes to double quotes. It's a rather arbitrary thing, although it seems the community leans more on the single quote side of the argument. It'd be good to have a look at the results without those changes to see more of the signal and less of the noise. |
menshikh-iv
force-pushed
the
apply-black
branch
from
7158a17
to
62fc22d
Compare
|
@mpenkov done, please check again (I made force push)
|
| b'\x82f\xf6\xb9"6l$\xb8j@\xc0\x8a\xb0l1..\xbak\x83ls\x15\xbc\xf4\xc1\x13\xbe\xf8E\xb8\x9d\r\xa8\x9dk' \ | ||
| b'\x84\xd3n\xfa\xacQ\x07\xb1%y\xaav\xb4\x08\xe0z\x1b\x16\xf5\x04\xe9\xcc\xb9\x08z\x1en7.G\xfc]\xc9\x14' \ | ||
| b'\xe1B@\xbb!8`' | ||
| DATA = b'BZh91AY&SY.\xc8N\x18\x00\x01>_\x80\x00\x10@\x02\xff\xf0\x01\x07n\x00?\xe7\xff\xe00\x01\x99\xaa\x00' b'\xc0\x03F\x86\x8c#&\x83F\x9a\x03\x06\xa6\xd0\xa6\x93M\x0fQ\xa7\xa8\x06\x804hh\x12$\x11\xa4i4\xf14S' b'\xd2<Q\xb5\x0fH\xd3\xd4\xdd\xd5\x87\xbb\xf8\x94\r\x8f\xafI\x12\xe1\xc9\xf8/E\x00pu\x89\x12]\xc9' b'\xbbDL\nQ\x0e\t1\x12\xdf\xa0\xc0\x97\xac2O9\x89\x13\x94\x0e\x1c7\x0ed\x95I\x0c\xaaJ\xa4\x18L\x10' b'\x05#\x9c\xaf\xba\xbc/\x97\x8a#C\xc8\xe1\x8cW\xf9\xe2\xd0\xd6M\xa7\x8bXa<e\x84t\xcbL\xb3\xa7\xd9' b'\xcd\xd1\xcb\x84.\xaf\xb3\xab\xab\xad`n}\xa0lh\tE,\x8eZ\x15\x17VH>\x88\xe5\xcd9gd6\x0b\n\xe9\x9b' b'\xd5\x8a\x99\xf7\x08.K\x8ev\xfb\xf7xw\xbb\xdf\xa1\x92\xf1\xdd|/";\xa2\xba\x9f\xd5\xb1#A\xb6\xf6' b'\xb3o\xc9\xc5y\\\xebO\xe7\x85\x9a\xbc\xb6f8\x952\xd5\xd7"%\x89>V,\xf7\xa6z\xe2\x9f\xa3\xdf\x11' b'\x11"\xd6E)I\xa9\x13^\xca\xf3r\xd0\x03U\x922\xf26\xec\xb6\xed\x8b\xc3U\x13\x9d\xc5\x170\xa4\xfa^' b'\x92\xacDF\x8a\x97\xd6\x19\xfe\xdd\xb8\xbd\x1a\x9a\x19\xa3\x80ankR\x8b\xe5\xd83]\xa9\xc6\x08' b'\x82f\xf6\xb9"6l$\xb8j@\xc0\x8a\xb0l1..\xbak\x83ls\x15\xbc\xf4\xc1\x13\xbe\xf8E\xb8\x9d\r\xa8\x9dk' b'\x84\xd3n\xfa\xacQ\x07\xb1%y\xaav\xb4\x08\xe0z\x1b\x16\xf5\x04\xe9\xcc\xb9\x08z\x1en7.G\xfc]\xc9\x14' b'\xe1B@\xbb!8`' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree, looks strange
|
In general, I think this is solving a problem that smart_open doesn't have. I can't remember the last time we had an argument about code style as part of this project. On the other hand, if you're having code style argument issues in gensim, and want to trial out this solution on smart_open, then it makes sense. |
Just a demonstration of
blackcode formatter, see #216 for more information:'->"configurable too@mpenkov @piskvorky guys, do you like it?