You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Use Yup or just write our own validation method? Using Yup might not be worth it because we need custom logic based on brick types and are also overlaying runtime errors (via traces)
Part of the Yup schema will need to be dynamically created based on:
Extension type (affects which prop name is used for the block configuration pipeline)
Number of bricks in the pipeline
Validation:
outputKey format validation (must be valid identifier, i.e., start with a letter and only including letters and numbers). NOTE: effect and renderer bricks should not have outputKeys (the field is disabled in the UI)
Panel/Sidepanel extensions should have exactly 1 renderer. (If there's more than 1, add a warning to each renderer after the first)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
* FormikError type
* Validate Renderers
* Display block error
* Validate if renderer is not the last block
* Using FormikErrorTree
* Rewording
* code review fixes
Questions
Part of the Yup schema will need to be dynamically created based on:
Validation:
outputKey
format validation (must be valid identifier, i.e., start with a letter and only including letters and numbers). NOTE: effect and renderer bricks should not have outputKeys (the field is disabled in the UI)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: