Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add sample rel_* versus lay_* #105

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 4, 2021
Merged

Conversation

kirchsth
Copy link
Contributor

#74 Add sample, which describes the differences between Rel_* and Lay_*

README.md Outdated
@@ -161,7 +161,45 @@ You can force the direction of a relationship by using:
* `Rel_L`, `Rel_Left`
* `Rel_R`, `Rel_Right`

In rare cases, you can force the layout using hidden relationships, `Lay_U`, `Lay_D`, `Lay_L`, `Lay_R`.
In rare cases, you can force a layout of objects which has no relationship by using:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In rare cases, you can force the layout of objects which have no relationships by using:

Not a native speaker but I think it's grammatically correct

@Potherca
Copy link
Member

Potherca commented Feb 4, 2021

Reviewed changes, all looks good. Merging.

@Potherca Potherca merged commit 7df300d into plantuml-stdlib:master Feb 4, 2021
@Potherca Potherca added this to the v2.1.0 milestone Apr 4, 2021
@kirchsth kirchsth deleted the feature/74 branch July 4, 2021 14:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants