simple_form_for and :namespace

[oprema]

Hi,

I am not sure if this is an issue with simple form.
I have a few objects of the same model I want to edit in one view. To guarantie that the input ids are unique I use the namespace option like that;

= simple_form_for unit, url: users_unit_path(unit), namespace: unit.id, remote: true do |f|
...

Now if I have a association like that:
= f.association :room_properties, label: false, collection: RoomProperty.all, as: :check_boxes

The html that is generated looks like:
...

<div class="control-group check_boxes optional unit_room_properties">
<div class="controls">
<span class="checkbox">
<label name="unit[room_property_ids]" for="unit_room_property_ids_7">
<input id="1_unit_room_property_ids_7" class="check_boxes optional" type="checkbox" value="7" name="unit[room_property_ids][]">
Central heating
</label>

...

As you can see the labels for is "unit_room_property_ids_7" but it should be ""1_unit_room_property_ids_7".
Is it a bug? And if not how do I correct the label to fit with the input id?

Thanks

[rafaelfranca]

Which version of Simple Form are you using?

[oprema]

I am on version 3.1.0.rc2.

[rafaelfranca]

Does it works with the Rails helpers collection_check_box?

[oprema]

Ok, I changed
= f.association :room_properties, label: false, collection: RoomProperty.all,
to
= f.collection_check_boxes :room_properties, RoomProperty.all, :id, (:)name

Note: Github does not let me use colon-name

it works and the labels are correctly set.

[rafaelfranca]

Cool, so it is definitely a simple form bug. I'll work on it.
On Nov 25, 2014 4:06 PM, "oprema" notifications@github.com wrote:

Ok, I changed
= f.association :room_properties, label: false, collection:
RoomProperty.all,
to
= f.collection_check_boxes :room_properties, RoomProperty.all, :id, (:)name

Note: Github does not let me use colon-name

it works and the labels are correctly set.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1161 (comment)
.

[oprema]

Great! Good luck bug hunting.

[oprema]

Thanks so much. It works ike a charm. Great gem btw.

[rafaelfranca]

Thanks.

[bhh]

awesome took me half an hour to to find the namespace feature, getting angry that its broken and finding this thread. and then its already solved, just needed to update ;) so happy that people really care about this little features