Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

README.md refers to jest-dev-server #207

Closed
fschoenfeldt opened this issue Jul 9, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

README.md refers to jest-dev-server #207

fschoenfeldt opened this issue Jul 9, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@fschoenfeldt
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the bug
The README.md still refers to jest-dev-server although in the changelog, it was stated that it was replaced by https://github.com/playwright-community/jest-process-manager

serverOptions <[object]>. All jest-dev-server options.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior: Open README.md in this repository

Expected behavior
Link to the new dependency jest-process-manager

Screenshots
./.

Desktop (please complete the following information):
./.

Jest configuration (Either in the package.json > jest or in the jest.config.js):
./.

Additional context
Correct me if I'm wrong! :-)

fschoenfeldt added a commit to fschoenfeldt/jest-playwright that referenced this issue Jul 9, 2020
mmarkelov pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 9, 2020
@mmarkelov mmarkelov added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jul 9, 2020
fschoenfeldt added a commit to fschoenfeldt/jest-playwright that referenced this issue Jul 9, 2020
@fschoenfeldt
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mmarkelov I found another reference to the deprecated jest-dev-server, see my PR:
#209

mmarkelov pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 9, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants