You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mauritsvanrees we should add the classifier when we have tests and a release that works with Plone 5.2 IMHO. Any particular reason why you committed to master directly?
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tisto I did this to all packages in coredev 5.2 which are in sources.cfg and which already had Plone 5.1 in the classifiers. See plone/Products.CMFPlone#2524 (comment)
If you see reason to revert it in this case, that is fine with me.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mauritsvanrees all good! If you do this for lots of packages at the same time it's a different trade-off. Thanks for your work and sorry for the noise!
ea5b7f4
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mauritsvanrees we should add the classifier when we have tests and a release that works with Plone 5.2 IMHO. Any particular reason why you committed to master directly?
ea5b7f4
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tisto I did this to all packages in coredev 5.2 which are in
sources.cfg
and which already had Plone 5.1 in the classifiers. See plone/Products.CMFPlone#2524 (comment)If you see reason to revert it in this case, that is fine with me.
ea5b7f4
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mauritsvanrees all good! If you do this for lots of packages at the same time it's a different trade-off. Thanks for your work and sorry for the noise!