More core shrinking

[samth]

To do for the whole shrinking:

• Remove most of net.
• Make the core not use mzscheme.
• Test the above.
• Move mzscheme out of the core.
• Move much of the compiler collection out of the core.

[mflatt]

Generally looks good to me.

The "windll.rkt" module has a with-output-to-file that's missing the #:exists keyword. You might want to double-check for more (that's what I usually get wrong when porting from mzscheme to racket/base), but I didn't find other cases by just looking at random files.

The Racket version number should be incremented. If I understand correctly, that's enough to avoid any compatibility issues in xform.

[rfindler]

For me, the less common but far more confusing one is pretty-print =>
pretty-write. FWIW.

Robby

On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Matthew Flatt notifications@github.comwrote:

Generally looks good to me.

The "windll.rkt" module has a with-output-to-file that's missing the
#:exists keyword. You might want to double-check for more (that's what I
usually get wrong when porting from mzscheme to racket/base), but I
didn't find other cases by just looking at random files.

The Racket version number should be incremented. If I understand
correctly, that's enough to avoid any compatibility issues in xform.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/377#issuecomment-20258190
.

[samth]

@rfindler The pretty-print -> pretty-write thing is about scheme -> racket, fortunately. However, that suggests that I need to be careful about using racket/base without checking for the things different between scheme and racket.

[rfindler]

Yes, it is. mzscheme is like scheme/base in this regard, however.

On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

@rfindler https://github.com/rfindler The pretty-print -> pretty-writething is about
scheme -> racket, fortunately. However, that suggests that I need to be
careful about using racket/base without checking for the things different
between scheme and racket.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/377#issuecomment-20282668
.