Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add some missing attributes and one API for server support #384

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 7, 2022

Conversation

rhc54
Copy link
Member

@rhc54 rhc54 commented Jan 16, 2022

There are a few attributes servers need in order to support
singleton operations as well as user-specified time limits
on job and spawn operations. Current server module functions
do not include the ability for the server library to pass
a local status from a collective operation (i.e., when the
server library aggregates all local participation before
calling the host)

Add a few job-related error constants for clear reporting
to the user.

Add a useful variant of a data management function.

Signed-off-by: Ralph Castain rhc@pmix.org

@rhc54 rhc54 added the RFC Request for Comment label Jan 16, 2022
@rhc54 rhc54 added this to the PMIx v4.2 Standard milestone Jan 16, 2022
@rhc54 rhc54 requested a review from jjhursey January 16, 2022 20:38
@rhc54 rhc54 self-assigned this Jan 16, 2022
@rhc54
Copy link
Member Author

rhc54 commented Jan 16, 2022

Please use emoji reactions ON THIS COMMENT to indicate your position on this proposal.

You do not need to vote on every proposal
If you have no opinion, don't vote - that is also useful data
If you've already commented on this issue, please still vote so
we know your current thoughts
Not all proposals solve exactly the same problem, so we may end
up accepting proposals that appear to have some overlap
This is not a binding majority-rule vote, but it will be a very
significant input into the corresponding ASC decision.

Here are the meanings for the emojis:

Hooray or Rocket: I support this so strongly that I
want to be an advocate for it
Heart: I think this is an ideal solution
Thumbs up: I'd be happy with this solution
Confused: I'd rather we not do this, but I can tolerate it
Thumbs down: I'd be actively unhappy, and may even consider
other technologies instead
If you want to explain in more detail, feel free to add another
comment, but please also vote on this comment.

@jjhursey jjhursey added the Eligible Eligible for consideration by ASC label Jan 25, 2022
Chap_API_Proc_Mgmt.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Chap_API_Sync_Access.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jjhursey
Copy link
Member

jjhursey commented Mar 7, 2022

PMIx ASC 1Q 2022

  • Passed the first vote: 11 yes / 0 no / 0 abstain
  • This is can be merged into main/v5 and v4 branches (I'll work on that)

@jjhursey jjhursey added the Accepted as Provisional ASC vote passed. Accepted as Provisional! label Mar 7, 2022
jjhursey
jjhursey previously approved these changes Mar 7, 2022
There are a few attributes servers need in order to support
singleton operations as well as user-specified time limits
on job and spawn operations. Current server module functions
do not include the ability for the server library to pass
a local status from a collective operation (i.e., when the
server library aggregates all local participation before
calling the host)

Add a few job-related error constants for clear reporting
to the user.

Add a useful variant of a data management function.

Signed-off-by: Ralph Castain <rhc@pmix.org>
Provide a little more explanation of the new attributes, including
an "advice to hosts" section on the local collective completion
status attribute.

Signed-off-by: Ralph Castain <rhc@pmix.org>
@jjhursey
Copy link
Member

jjhursey commented Mar 7, 2022

Editorial: Rebased the reference branch without text changes to prepare to merge.

@jjhursey jjhursey merged commit 3604086 into pmix:v4 Mar 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Accepted as Provisional ASC vote passed. Accepted as Provisional! Eligible Eligible for consideration by ASC RFC Request for Comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants