Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue 414: ordering & method of specifying procs in collectives clarified #490

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 14, 2024

Conversation

dsolt
Copy link
Contributor

@dsolt dsolt commented Jul 31, 2023

… clarified

Signed-off-by: David Solt dsolt@us.ibm.com

@dsolt dsolt added the RFC Request for Comment label Jul 31, 2023
@dsolt dsolt changed the title Issue 414: ordering and method of specifying processes in collectives… Issue 414: ordering & method of specifying procs in collectives clarified Jul 31, 2023
… clarified

Signed-off-by: David Solt <dsolt@us.ibm.com>
@dsolt dsolt force-pushed the issue_414_process_description_ordering branch from 8cd63be to dff11f0 Compare August 7, 2023 21:11
@jjhursey jjhursey added the Eligible Eligible for consideration by ASC label Oct 4, 2023
@jjhursey
Copy link
Member

PMIx ASC 4Q 2023 Meeting

  • Passed first vote: 9 yes / 0 no / 0 abstain
  • Can be presented for a second vote during the 1Q 2024 meeting

@jjhursey jjhursey added the First Vote Passed ASC first vote passed label Oct 19, 2023
The ordering of the entries in the \refarg{procs} has no significance, neither is the method used for identifying processes.
Some callers may describe the target set of processes using PMIX_RANK_WILDCARD while other
callers may list the individual processes of a namespace explicitly.

If the \refattr{PMIX_GROUP_NOTIFY_TERMINATION} attribute is provided and has a value of \code{true}, then either the construct leader (if \refattr{PMIX_GROUP_LEADER} is provided) or all participants who register for the \refconst{PMIX_GROUP_MEMBER_FAILED} event will receive events whenever a process fails or terminates prior to calling \refapi{PMIx_Group_construct} – i.e. if a \emph{group leader} is declared, \textit{only} that process will receive the event. In the absence of a declared leader, \textit{all} specified group members will receive the event.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add a brief comment that "Because the name is used to determine the uniqueness of the collective...."

@abouteiller abouteiller linked an issue Jan 25, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@abouteiller abouteiller added the Accepted as Provisional ASC vote passed. Accepted as Provisional! label Feb 28, 2024
@abouteiller
Copy link
Contributor

abouteiller commented Feb 28, 2024

PMIx ASC 2024Q1 Meeting

Passed first vote: 9 yes / 0 no / 0 abstain
Accepted as provisional (including ca67509).

@abouteiller
Copy link
Contributor

@pmix/asc-release-managers ready to merge

@raffenet raffenet merged commit 99559c8 into pmix:master Mar 14, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Accepted as Provisional ASC vote passed. Accepted as Provisional! Eligible Eligible for consideration by ASC First Vote Passed ASC first vote passed RFC Request for Comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

PMIx_Connect/PMIx_Disconnect process array ordering
4 participants