simplify algorithms of synchronization objects #268
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
The implementations of synchronization objects are overlapped but differently written in each file. Specifically, the core algorithm of synchronization objects is managing a queue of waiting threads, but
ABT_cond
,ABT_barrier
,ABT_future
, andABT_eventual
use similar but different code.ABT_mutex
uses an incorrect queue implementation (see #14, #41, and #102).Solution
To avoid code duplication, this PR implements
ABTI_waitlist
.ABT_mutex
will use this when--disable-simple-mutex
is passed; by default the existing yield-based implementation is used. BetterABT_mutex
implementation is our future work.Expected impact
This change significantly affects the performance of
ABT_mutex
with--disable-simple-mutex
. The new implementation is correct but slower in some cases. This PR should not affect the performance of the other synchronization objects (includingABT_mutex
without--disable-simple-mutex
) much -- this PR should make them faster.