Rewrite pnpm using reactive programming

[zkochan]

Breaking changes:

• reverted Peer dependencies are always grouped with the relying packages.
  Even when the peer dependencies are top dependencies. 1fb94de
  (the node_modules layout version might have to be bumped to v2)
• reverted Fails on named install when node_modules is not up-to-date (Fail on named installs/uninstalls when node_modules is not up to date pnpm#841)

[zkochan]

All tests pass but pnpm is 2 times slower with these changes. I can investigate it next week but maybe someone experienced with rxjs can notice errors in my "reactive code" as I am really inexperienced with rxjs

[zkochan]

this should be set before running installDependencies()

[zkochan]

As of now, with these changes, pnpm has the same speed as without them.

[vjpr]

Cool. Is it ready to test? Can you publish a beta and I will test on my massive monolith.

…

On Fri 25. Aug 2017 at 11:11 PM, Zoltan Kochan ***@***.***> wrote: As of now, with these changes, pnpm has the same speed as without them. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#8 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AARLRaNO5Ra6N468o6wytFadSolKQxWYks5sbziVgaJpZM4OwxzN> .

[zkochan]

I want to try to make it a little bit faster than the current version (to justify the huge changes). I will probably do this: pnpm/pnpm#841. It will allow saving the shrinkwrap and store index files earlier.

Also, André Staltz suggested using most instead of rxjs. He says sometimes it is a lot faster than rxjs. I might try that... or maybe later as it might be a lot of work.

I'll publish a beta this weekend though.

[zkochan]

@vjpr I published the changes as next via pnpm@2.0.0-beta.0

[zkochan]

I reverted the breaking changes. They were not necessary, so this will be a minor version bump in pnpm