Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disfavor new subscript #2875

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Feb 29, 2024
Merged

Disfavor new subscript #2875

merged 3 commits into from Feb 29, 2024

Conversation

mbrandonw
Copy link
Member

Version 1.9 introduced a new Case subscript to allow the store.send(\.field, …) syntax for binding actions, but that created potential ambiguity. This fixes #2874 and #2872.

@mbrandonw mbrandonw merged commit 2ddf47f into main Feb 29, 2024
7 checks passed
@mbrandonw mbrandonw deleted the binding-teststore-fix branch February 29, 2024 22:25
cgrindel-self-hosted-renovate bot added a commit to cgrindel/rules_swift_package_manager that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2024
…ure to from: "1.9.1" (#944)

This PR contains the following updates:

| Package | Update | Change |
|---|---|---|
|
[pointfreeco/swift-composable-architecture](https://togithub.com/pointfreeco/swift-composable-architecture)
| patch | `from: "1.9.0"` -> `from: "1.9.1"` |

---

### Release Notes

<details>
<summary>pointfreeco/swift-composable-architecture
(pointfreeco/swift-composable-architecture)</summary>

###
[`v1.9.1`](https://togithub.com/pointfreeco/swift-composable-architecture/releases/tag/1.9.1)

[Compare
Source](https://togithub.com/pointfreeco/swift-composable-architecture/compare/1.9.0...1.9.1)

#### What's Changed

- Fixed: Addressed a regression introduced in 1.9.0 in which a case key
path could become ambiguous if an action case name *and* a bindable
action key path name overlap
([pointfreeco/swift-composable-architecture#2875).
- Infrastructure: Add step for making enum reducer state equatable in
tutorial
([pointfreeco/swift-composable-architecture#2873).
- Infrastructure: Fixed a small typo on 1.9 migration guide (thank
[@&#8203;takehilo](https://togithub.com/takehilo),
[pointfreeco/swift-composable-architecture#2876).

**Full Changelog**:
pointfreeco/swift-composable-architecture@1.9.0...1.9.1

</details>

---

### Configuration

📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined),
Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 **Automerge**: Enabled.

♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the
rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 **Immortal**: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get
[config help](https://togithub.com/renovatebot/renovate/discussions) if
that's undesired.

---

- [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check
this box

---

This PR has been generated by [Renovate
Bot](https://togithub.com/renovatebot/renovate).

<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzNi4xMDAuMCIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjM2LjEwMC4wIiwidGFyZ2V0QnJhbmNoIjoibWFpbiJ9-->

Co-authored-by: Self-hosted Renovate Bot <361546+cgrindel-self-hosted-renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.enterprise.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Store scoping produces unexpected type, compiler error after updating to 1.9.0
2 participants