Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(python): Properly propagate strictness in some constructor cases #15166

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 19, 2024

Conversation

stinodego
Copy link
Member

Also updating our test suite for the upcoming strictness changes.

@github-actions github-actions bot added fix Bug fix python Related to Python Polars labels Mar 19, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.21%. Comparing base (514c75b) to head (b3405e8).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #15166      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.22%   81.21%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1348     1348              
  Lines      175344   175344              
  Branches     2506     2506              
==========================================
- Hits       142416   142401      -15     
- Misses      32448    32463      +15     
  Partials      480      480              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@stinodego stinodego merged commit e204928 into main Mar 19, 2024
13 checks passed
@stinodego stinodego deleted the strictness branch March 19, 2024 21:34
@c-peters c-peters added the accepted Ready for implementation label Mar 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
accepted Ready for implementation fix Bug fix python Related to Python Polars
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants