Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dynamic Pricing for Bulk Coretime Sales #6

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Tomen
Copy link

@Tomen Tomen commented Jul 9, 2023

RFC-1 asks for another RFC that specifies the pricing function of Bulk Coretime Sales. RFC-6 is a proposal to apply a dynamic pricing function that has several levers for governance to adapt the pricing curve to changing market conditions.

This RFC follows a proposal in the Polkadot Forum here and an invitation by Gavin Wood to submit an RFC here.

ToDos:

  • move images to blog post and create reference to blog post
  • consider pricing edge case if more renewals than target happen description

@Tomen Tomen mentioned this pull request Jul 9, 2023
@rphmeier
Copy link
Contributor

an invitation by Gavin Wood to submit an RFC #1 (comment).

FWIW, the rules in #2 (currently being voted on as Fellowship Referendum 7) state that anyone may open an RFC , invitation or not :)


## Motivation

RFC-1 proposes periodic Bulk Coretime Sales as a mechanism to sell continouos regions of blockspace (suggested to be 4 weeks in length). A number of Blockspace Regions (compare RFC-1 & RFC-3) are provided for sale to the Broker-Chain each period and shall be sold in a way that provides value-capture for the Polkadot network. The exact pricing mechanism is out of scope for RFC-1 and shall be provided by this RFC.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

RFC-3 is a companion to RFC-1, for underlying improvements to scheduling infrastructure - the goal is for them to communicate via RFC-5. But it's probably out of scope for anything related to pricing/sales

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

was that just a comment on the relationship of the RFCs or should I change something?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants