Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Option for glide to bend active sample rather than triggering new sample #74

Open
djkurzman opened this issue Sep 22, 2020 · 12 comments
Open
Labels
approved enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@djkurzman
Copy link

Tracker currently re-triggers the instrument sample when activating glide FX. Requesting option prevent retrigger of the sample, and rather portamento the actively playing sample to the new note when glide is used. This would make the glide effect similar to a 303 slide.

@djkurzman djkurzman added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 22, 2020
@djkurzman djkurzman changed the title Option for glide to bend active note rather than triggering new note Option for glide to bend active sample rather than triggering new sample Sep 22, 2020
@HakkahFR
Copy link

HakkahFR commented Oct 3, 2020

Exellent suggestion and very important for me too

@piotr3500
Copy link
Collaborator

Slide FX is coming.

@HakkahFR
Copy link

Slide FX is coming.

Piotr, are you still working on the fx slide or it was canceled ? Ty for the last update with the live line input, change everything for me

@piotr3500
Copy link
Collaborator

piotr3500 commented Nov 19, 2020 via email

@Tombelliard
Copy link

Does slide fx will be available for midi too?

@djkurzman
Copy link
Author

djkurzman commented Jan 21, 2021 via email

@djkurzman
Copy link
Author

Playing with the new Slide FX in 1.4.0 Beta 1. Hopefully this was not the feature to address this request. The new Slide feature is a constant note bend on a newly triggered sample. Whereas this request was to be able to trigger a portamento on an actively playing sample. Don't get me wrong, I do like the new slide because it is very useful. I just want to make sure the portamento request remains open. Thanks!

@HakkahFR
Copy link

That's the biggest problem of every synth i use, the portamento is not musical. Tb 303 and sh 101 sound so good because the note are not retriggered. I really don't understand why devellopers don't make the possibity to switch betwin the two mode of slide : retrigger and non retrigger. I hope for this change in the tracker, it's one of the most forgotten option of all hardware

@HakkahFR
Copy link

Its finally ok i made a mistake by entering the slide fx on the note instead of between two note

@djkurzman
Copy link
Author

Same here, and I admit that I didn't read the description panel well enough to fully understand how SlideFX was working. It still seems maybe a little unintuitive for use as a portamento. I do like the slide effect as it is, but maybe just for creating continuous up and down slides for samples and being able to set the value to control transition speed rather than 16th semitones. A normal portamento would be better as [Set first note playing, Set second note with portamento FX (value effects transition speed), portamento FX slides previous note to new note]. This would be exactly how GlideFX currently works, except without retriggering the sample.

It would also be cool if that effect could trigger portamento over MIDI, simply by allowing the previous note to cut slightly after the next note begins playing. That way we do portamento slides with external 303 synths and such without having to use up two channels.

@HakkahFR
Copy link

100% agree with you djkurzman

@djkurzman
Copy link
Author

I hate to sound pushy, but is there any word on where a proper portamento is on the roadmap? Unfortunately, I have barely used the Tracker while waiting for it. The currently glide and slide fx are just not as functional in my opinion.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants