detail view sensitive to annotation problem

[ValWood]

I came across this yesterday.
Not sure how to describe without a lot of words!

But this pic shows a supposed "details view"

2 issues:

1. octanoyltransferase is collapsed as in detail view (i.e evidence is not showing)
2. With field is missing for ISS (curation seems OK with=UniProt:A6NK58; )

This is lip2, I didn't see similar on any other page yet?

[ValWood]

[mah11]

problem is likely that the with entry should be UniProtKB:A6NK58 (i.e. prefix not just "UniProt"); I've just fixed it

although maybe Kim could also do something to make a problem with one annotation not affect the display of other annotations

[ValWood]

Is this already on the chado tracker in some guise?
Maybe the issue is just to cosistently check the IDs...or is there a differnet problem.

@mah11 could you decide if a ticket is required and close this one?

[kimrutherford]

It looks OK to me - you have clicked to show the details of the first annotation, but not the second (one has "-" one has "+")

[mah11]

The original problem is that we were seeing the display in the screenshot when we clicked the "show details" link for the whole MF section (I think due to an annotation problem that has since been fixed), not just the + for one annotation.

There is an outstanding website task to ensure that a problem with one annotation doesn't bork the display of other annotations in the same section. This is the ticket for that.

I've added a comment to an existing Chado ticket to get similar annotation problems reported - pombase/pombase-chado#614

[ValWood]

so I can close this on...

[mah11]

I would not close this, unless Kim has done something to ensure that one off-kilter annotation doesn't affect the display of good ones.

[kimrutherford]

The original problem is that we were seeing the display in the screenshot when we clicked the
"show details" link for the whole MF section

I can't reproduce that. "Show details ..." and "Show summary ..." and the plus/minus buttons work fine for me for the MF section on the lip2 page.

Val, did you see that on preview or on http://pombase2.bioinformatics.nz? Although they should be the same.

[mah11]

Yeah, it wouldn't be reproducible for this gene page now, because we've fixed the annotation that was causing the problem.

If you want, I could un-fix it for you to see the effect.

[ValWood]

Maybe this is enough to fix similar problems at source?
pombase/pombase-chado#614

[ValWood]

Can I close this one since there is a ticket to add a check to chado?

[kimrutherford]

Yep, I think so.