feat: add control over internal/external ports #335
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
M4C4R
changed the title
|
Any update on getting this merged? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Allow configuring internal/external ports used by the Pomerium services (Authenticate, Authorize, Databroker, Proxy).
Since these are restricted to run on either ports 80 or 443 depending on
config.insecure. The Helm chart cannot be deployed into OpenShift where access to privileged ports is restricted.Introduce
proxy.internalPort,proxy.externalPort, andservice.internalPortto behave the same way the existing parameterservice.externalPortdoes.Related issues
#334
Checklist: