Clarify that struct is always a pointer
#527
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ponylang-main
added
the
discuss during sync
It wasn't clear that a struct as a return value from C should be read as "pointer to struct".
SeanTAllen
force-pushed
the
ffi-struct-pointer
branch
from
aa9d0f3
to
81998d0
Compare
ergl
approved these changes
Jan 16, 2024
jemc
reviewed
Jan 16, 2024
ponylang-main
removed
the
discuss during sync
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It wasn't clear that a struct as a return value from C should be read as "pointer to struct".