Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

added stickleback genome... #1105

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2021

Conversation

vitorpavinato
Copy link
Contributor

referenced to added stickleback genome #1090

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 13, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #1105 (bbdeed0) into main (be4b9b7) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head bbdeed0 differs from pull request most recent head c342934. Consider uploading reports for the commit c342934 to get more accurate results
Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1105      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.53%   99.52%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          92       95       +3     
  Lines        3015     2978      -37     
  Branches      360      350      -10     
==========================================
- Hits         3001     2964      -37     
  Misses          6        6              
  Partials        8        8              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
stdpopsim/catalog/GasAcu/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
stdpopsim/catalog/GasAcu/genome_data.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
stdpopsim/catalog/GasAcu/species.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
stdpopsim/cli.py 98.16% <0.00%> (-0.23%) ⬇️
stdpopsim/citations.py 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update be4b9b7...c342934. Read the comment docs.

@vitorpavinato vitorpavinato mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2021
14 tasks
@vitorpavinato
Copy link
Contributor Author

vitorpavinato commented Nov 13, 2021

I initiated by running python3 -m maintenance add-species-ncbi 9307941 (see #819) to create the species.py and genome_data.py. I manually removed the quotation around each chromosome size value.

@vitorpavinato
Copy link
Contributor Author

QC for stickleback #1091

@vitorpavinato vitorpavinato marked this pull request as ready for review November 13, 2021 18:19
Comment on lines 87 to 88
name="Gasterosteus aculeatus",
common_name="Gasterosteus aculeatus aculeatus (three-spined stickleback)",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wouldn't this be

Suggested change
name="Gasterosteus aculeatus",
common_name="Gasterosteus aculeatus aculeatus (three-spined stickleback)",
name="Gasterosteus aculeatus",
common_name="Three-spined stickleback",

... ? Or, do we need the subspecies in name?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right! I should have edited it before. Thanks for catching it @petrelharp.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, great! So, now you could either (a) make the change yourself in a new commit, or (b) just click the "commit suggestion" button on my suggestion. Then squash & rebase this PR (and ask if you need help with that?).

@petrelharp
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM! Just a minor question about the "common name".

@petrelharp
Copy link
Contributor

Whoops - forgot to fix up the tests...

@petrelharp
Copy link
Contributor

Awesome! Just needs a squash & rebase.

@petrelharp
Copy link
Contributor

The failing test is just a transient URL error; I'll merge this. Yay!!! Thanks!!!

@petrelharp petrelharp merged commit a00085c into popsim-consortium:main Nov 17, 2021
@petrelharp petrelharp mentioned this pull request May 16, 2022
14 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants